Actually, there are several Socionics theorists who are exploring the effects of gender on personality and a good number of them have different "profiles" of what a given type may look like when "playing" a given gender role. Here, for example:
Socionics - the16types.info - Dostoyevsky, Female portrait, INFj by Beskova
Socionics - the16types.info - Dostoyevsky, Male portrait, INFj by Beskova
No need. I've already read everything available in English, as well as all primary sources of Russian.
You're speaking of the concept of gender in the context that it is distinct from sex. I am speaking of sex, and the fundamental differences in brain functioning.
Socionics models a concept of information processing and various forms of information transfer between types of information metabolism, known as intertype relationships.
What it does not do, however, is recognize the fundamental differences in information metabolism between the sexes. What you have referenced are articles under the premise that a male and a female may process information in a way that is fundamentally the same; they are articles which ignore the dichotomy of male/female.
When we take the dual pair of EIE, denoted as 1, and LSI, denoted as -1, and apply the male/female dichotomy, denoted as 1 and -1, we are left with an inherent contradiction:
1 (male) * -1 (LSI) * -1 (female) * 1 (EIE) = 1 (positive match)
-1 (female) * -1 (LSI) * -1 (female) * 1 (EIE) = -1 (negative match)
Such, the information metabolism between two "duals" of opposing sex may only be equivalent between two "duals" of the same sex, if the fundamental information metabolism of one of the females is the opposite of the assumed type.
The problem, these days, is that it's difficult to understand gender as a dichotomy because gender is now explosive in our society. One of my children tells me she is a demi-sexual pan-romantic. Hard to make that fit into the standard male/female dichotomy. That said, there's no doubt that gender roles affect one's outward appearance to the world as well as one's sense of identity.
Typology is sex independent in a world dependent upon sex. It appeals predominantly to those who do not know or care about the differences between the sexes as a result.
Within Socionics itself, superstitions based upon the essence of people and their relationships is a primary indicator of being ST.