Jaguar
Active member
- Joined
- May 5, 2007
- Messages
- 20,647
talking about how "fake" Fe is. Which, in my opinion, is an accusation that comes from a perspective of complete ignorance of what Fe actually means
Several years ago an Fe Dom started a thread seeking consensus on whether or not a sub-forum should exist. Needless to say, heading up a committee is something that might come naturally to her, whereas someone like me wouldn't even consider working on a committee, much less seek a consensus. People are wired differently.
Is her being group-oriented, fake? Is taking all that time to allow members to give their input, fake? That is her way of doing things. That doesn't make her way wrong, fake, or any other nonsense. It just means that's how she operates.
When I see someone using a word such as 'fake' in conjunction with any of the function-attitudes, it's most likely because someone in their life pissed them off, and they now wish to slap the same coat of paint on those who may share the same preference. Sloppy way to operate? You bet. But it goes on around here all the time.