Scapegoated 4 fun
Permabanned
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2017
- Messages
- 238
- MBTI Type
- INTJ
- Enneagram
- 5
I know this sounds crazy, but hear me out, I've actually put a lot of thought into this before coming to this conclusion: So feelers value making judgements/decisions based on how they feel rather than on facts/data/evidence. So essentially, isn't that like saying they can get away with being more ignorant? For instance, say there is a red stop sign in front of me. It is a concrete, observable fact that it is red, but if I were making decisions based on how I felt, couldn't I easily "feel" it is a blue sign, since I don't need fact or logic to support my decision to believe it's blue, only feelings? See what I mean? Couldn't this be more dangerous than we assume in that we can justify making (potentially selfish) decisions based on how we are feeling in the moment instead of taking the more thoughtful, considerate approach to trying to consider all the facts and variables before coming to a conclusion. What do you guys think? Do you see how/agree that this could be used as a way to justify one's ignorance or disregard for the importance of taking into account objective facts before reaching a conclusion? Why or why not?