G
garbage
Guest
That, too. I've been (casually) trying to dig one of those up and haven't found anything.And this is as Study, not a random double blind experiment.
That, too. I've been (casually) trying to dig one of those up and haven't found anything.And this is as Study, not a random double blind experiment.
I took an additional half-second out of my terribly busy life to add the word "reliability" to that search.
http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=mbti+reliability&btnG=&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5
For:
(though that article is a meta-analysis and so possibly worth a good deal.)
Against:
@ Skillchoas:
I've had countless similar experiences, but I've learned...
let the sheep herd with the sheep.
not everyone wants to wake up or be "unplugged" out of the matrix.
however the ones that are (us).....are awesome! (awesomely more aware of ourselves and our surrounding social environment)
so as they say...
just let them be... (in their ignorance)
The mbti helps me socialize
Astrology will also help us socialise, for when I walk into a bar and someone asks for my star sign, I know they are trying to pick me up.
Yes, mbti is astrology for the college educated.
Lol I'm barely a sophomore in high school but yeah astrology and mbti and typology and this stuff is a real harmless solution to figuring out human interaction
I've dealt with the same situations all my life, now that I'm 30 I've learned to live and chane by modeling what I believe, keeping my arguments short and sweet, because the ignorant don't care about facts or logic, just what they feel and it's easier to change how they feel, then constantly arguing about what I know due to research and facts. It's not easy, but gets more results.
The closest possibility is Dario Nardi.
The answer should have been easy, Jon. Not hard.
All you need to know is the difference between abstract and concrete. A concept and an object.
I read your entire post, but you strayed from the original point.
Edahn isn't around, but I'll take a wild guess that he's as tired of people not knowing what a construct is as I am.
It's been going on in this forum for years:
"I don't have Ti."
"I don't have Te."
Constructs such as the congnitive processes are not like checking yourself for a genital herpes blister - I don't have it!
Can you touch Te? No. Can you touch a herpes blister? Yes.
That was Edahn's point - the cognitive processes are constructs. They are not objects in the physical world we can touch with our fingers.
To this day, it amazes me how many people still talk about them as if they're a carton of orange juice in the refrigerator waiting to be consumed.
*On a side note: if you want to define intelligence, there are enough of those old threads scattered around this forum to fill a litter box.