1) Why is a fighter jet needed to answer simple questions about a post?
1) Why is a fighter jet needed to answer simple questions about a post?
2) WHY?
3) Then if one enjoys playing martyr, one enjoys being a victim. If one seeks out victimization, is it even accurate to call it victimization?
4) How do you know they read THAT SPECIFIC POST? You only provided suspect thread evidence. How were they supposed to know you wanted it dealt with when you made no overt communication about it?
Would you be willing to work with others to make the forum a better place, or do you prefer to fight the good fight all by your lonesome? In all honesty, I have a righteous streak that I would love to exercise for a good cause, if only I could comprehend and emotionally relate; you need only take a bit of time to translate your experience into a language that resonates with me, and I'd be willing to fight along side you.
Why y'all hatin' on the brother? Jim just tryna get his penguin dick wet.
IxTP said:Wank wank wank
Question: What is your fighter pilot call sign?
Nite Jimbo.
Jim,
I owe you an apology for my antagonistic posts in this thread. The thread started out very fun, entertaining, and informative and has quickly turned into............something else that I can't really find an English word for. But, for provoking you, I do apologize, as I don't wish that to be my normal style of operating.
*returns to "Ask an INTJ" thread for future insights into the INTJ mind*
That's not my job to tell them to deal with it, the past times I have asked them to deal with it I've been told to shut up and stop being a mod. Getting it yet?
Why do ask the impossible?
Behaviours manifested are common across all types, the "hows", in terms of motivation and attitudes would likely differ. Given this:
- How would an INTJ manifest attention-seeking behaviour? How much of it, do you think, is the death-grip of Fi, spinning out of control?
- How would they rationalize such egocentricity ("Fi")? Would they rationalize it so that it appears that the attention drawn is to an "issue" rather than to the individual? To appear more noble in cause?
- What is being reinforced through such attention, for an INTJ?
Impossible not. Lack of will not impossible ask.
If you guys don't agree with Jim's perspective on things, then let it go. The universe is not going to implode because opposing ideas are being held captive like canaries in everyone's skulls.
Why do you expect special treatment then?
If he was capable of explaining his perspective logically, I would. Is that too much to ask of an INTJ?
I believe you have been attempted to logically box me into a position of 'admitting' it is me who has the problem.
First, you started off trying to logically show that it was just me who had the problem. I then provided a sample of visible proof and stated truthfully that I had discussion with other members which was also proof.
Then you went to great lengths to try to draw teeth and prove to me the moderators were not biased, you then admitted they were after I provided truth that they were so.
You are then trying to excuse all of these failings by trying to pretend the moderators did not read the post even when I have already provided to you the record (which was recorded on the very post I made here!) regarding their activity.
However now you are willing to admit your own assumption is that the mods are incompetent and spitting teeth because I haven't answered your questions directly, instead providing you with an evidence based solution not based on the twin scientific principles of star maths and fuzzy thinking. All I have done is open the doors to the truth and you have agreed upon inspection and principle that my viewpoint is accurate.
If you guys don't agree with Jim's perspective on things, then let it go. The universe is not going to implode because opposing ideas are being held captive like canaries in everyone's skulls.
It's his thread to have fun in, and it was fun until this bizarre Ti vs Ni battle began.
Question: If you could bring an extinct animal back, which one would you choose?
Question: What planet in our solar system would you most like to visit?
Question: Do INTJs prefer honest assessments, even if they are blunt, to sugar coating?
Because it is not special, not in the request, as you admitted yesterday or indeed out of sync with existing actions.
If he was capable of explaining his perspective logically, I would. Is that too much to ask of an INTJ?
Isn't that why you actually have to make the request rather than magically waiting for someone to read your mind?
It's clear to me that both of you are eloquently explaining yourselves just fine as far as you both understand yourselves. The problem lays in the fact that you two aren't speaking the same language. It's like watching a UN debate where everyone's translator is barfing up their jejunum in the ladies toilet instead of helping their bosses hammer out some agreements between countries no one has ever heard of before.
Because it is not special, not in the request, as you admitted yesterday or indeed out of sync with existing actions.
Sigh, I will repeat this post for you, because you are embarrassed and you are starting to cry a lot. It's unflattering and it'll give you time to back out and think.
1) I would bring back the Sabertooth tiger, because tigers are awesome
2) I'm going to cheat and name a moon, Ganymede
3) Honesty is the best policy. Sugar coating doesn't really impact the value of the assessment.
It's clear to me that both of you are eloquently explaining yourselves just fine as far as you both understand yourselves. The problem lays in the fact that you two aren't speaking the same language. It's like watching a UN debate where everyone's translator is barfing up their jejunum in the ladies toilet instead of helping their bosses hammer out some agreements between countries no one has ever heard of before.
New Question:
1- Do you think the human body is inefficient? Considering that certain systems have a redundancy built into them, but other, crucial systems do not.
I am being as simple and straightforward as I can be using the English language. Or am I wrong?
I am being as simple and straightforward as I can be using the English language. Or am I wrong?
InvisibleJim, why do you feel so persecuted?
TL;DR: It's a pointless argument about nothing. On. The. Internet.