Qlip
Post Human Post
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2010
- Messages
- 8,464
- MBTI Type
- ENFP
- Enneagram
- 4w5
- Instinctual Variant
- sp/sx
@ KDude: why I am concerning myself with such discussions? Because I find them interesting. Religion fascinates me. Not because they are somehow useful. If you don't want to waste your time on that, well, don't waste your time on that. Waste your time on watching football, or playing the piano, or reading fiction, or collecting figurines and dusting them.
All useless things, but some of them can be fun. Which ones? Depends on your taste. Maybe you think it's strange to enjoy discussions rather than watching sports, but I do.
PS. I'm still searching for the ones who checked "god caused the universe to be" and not "god is older". I always thought that the whole notion of causality needed the notion of time... I'd like to know how you fit those two together!
That was me. If god created casuality itself and the notion of time, they aren't applicable to 'him' because god would be outside of it originally. There's at least one group of people who think of the act of creation as a ongoing constant act, so even if you would think casuality is applicable, they could be very well the same age.