• You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to additional post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), view blogs, respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so please join our community today! Just click here to register. You should turn your Ad Blocker off for this site or certain features may not work properly. If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us by clicking here.

Cold war 2.0

DiscoBiscuit

Meat Tornado
Joined
Apr 13, 2009
Messages
14,794
Enneagram
8w9
No hard feelings, really.
I remember your typology code so I know what to expect. Plus I pay close attention to blue and red US media, so I know what is going on.
Also we are both in the late 30s if I remember correctly, so we kinda have the same timeline of memory. What is kinda why I am not too judging, especially since I am from politically messed up environment myself. The only thing where I have "advantage" is that my general trend is going up as westernization is reforming the place. Therefore public debt is actually falling for years at this point, while I still have various benefits and safe home. So I probably have better night sleep than you on most nights. However all of that still comes with the twist since there is constantly this 24/7 hybrid threat that is trying over and over to pull us back into the days that were before the fall of Berlin wall. These people just don't want to give up. Which is kinda why I am so pro Ukraine, since they are actually shooting these people and hopefully they will brake the whole machine down. Since it is evident that this has to be sorted with force. Over the decades I got so much crap due to all this that I am not even feeling sorry for saying "they just have to go to the other world".


Therefore in this regard I am not saying that you should support Ukraine because of me but because of yourself. After all this is the same circle of people that over the last 30 years completely robbed US through unfair trade, while the start of the pandemic was never really explained. What in the end caused pretty much all of the instability that you have just numbered one by one. Plus from experience I can tell you that they just wouldn't give up. "You do your thing and I will do my thing" just isn't really in their mindset. We are simply dealing with too monolithic system that this can really happen.
I don't sleep well and never have. But I usually manage ok. The last few days with Israel have seen multiple sleepless nights just following everything.

I remember my childhood in the 90's where everyone said everything would get better, and by and large everything did.

I remember 9/11 and being furious and shocked but it not settling in for me this would affect people I know.

I then remember going to college where a Fraternity Brother of mine ended up in Iraq and sent us a flag from the from the front. And another friend of mine who had been a Marine and taken AK fire in his trauma plate. I remember him not liking parking lots because of IED's, and the reaction he would have if a car ever backfired. He would go scuba diving in underwater caves to relieve the stress. I have an ex girlfriend whose boyfriend before me had died over there.

Even with all of that the world still seemed a wonderful place full of infinite possibility. Since 2008 with every passing year more of that optimism gets sucked out of me.

I hoped against hope that if only this time the right guys won, things would get better. And sometimes they did for a time, but those victories have always been pyrrhic. Just momentary lulls in the pace of everything getting worse. The policies enacted during the good times merely addressing to most obvious of symptoms resulting from the disease at our core while doing little to treat the cause. But the house always wins in the end in Vegas and so too in American politics does the establishment always win in the end. I frequently wish that I didn't love to follow politics and the world like I do. It feels like it has made me a less happy person. But I can no more change the love in my heart for following the process than I could change the love I had for a woman. 20 years of adult life has taught me that.

Which brings me to your "advantage". What I wouldn't give to have that childlike sense of wonder at the possibility that tomorrow would be better than today back. Which is what makes your account of how America has affected your life such a difficult knot to unwind for me. On the one hand I am deeply glad for the positive experience you have had from American and Western influence in your area. I suspect there are millions possibly billions of ones like it even if they might not attribute it to us as you so graciously do (and I'm sure its not only US and the west that contributed as local good decisions probably played a greater role in it). But at the same time its hard to not notice that that uplift you've experienced seems to have increasingly come on the backs of native citizens in the West.

What you see as something that has been done to US via Rus or China or whoever, I feel very strongly as something we have done to ourselves. Now there are portions of blame here and China and the Russians have acted as no angels not made things easier for US. But I think now and have always thought that the only people who could defeat US was us. And I mean that in the "great game" sense of struggles between nations and empires.

In the cold light of dawn that exchange of the quality of American life for international gains is not something I am comfortable making. Now whether one feels like this is something we've done to ourselves or something that's been done to us from outside would greatly color ones views. I wouldn't deem myself able to change your mind on that here. What I can tell you is that looking at the general decline of US politics as a consensus holding or making institution since 2008 and the decline in institutional trust tells me a story that I'm not alone in this country in my sentiments.

It would be right to say that I deeply wish we were still a country unified enough to rise to the current international challenges you articulate here. I really would prefer a strong US led global order. The world has worked better when that's been the case than it ever before.

But what you see possibly as something the US is still imminently capable of, I see as something we no longer have the domestic unity or economic capacity for. We can only print so much money/debt before the appetite for that debt dwindles (as it has esp. internationally) with fears that the US gov't is no longer a sound investment. We will probably be able to keep the ball in the air for a little longer, assuming things don't get worse with more conflicts opening up (which they probably will). I say we have until our funding for Social Security runs out which is expected to to be in 2033 but I expect to be somewhat sooner given the increasing deficits we've been running. When that happens the only issue that matters in American politics will be figuring out a way to fix our budget and get it funded.

In all likelihood we will still try to maintain the global order for as long as possible, unless some group of American politicians manages to wrest control of the whole gov't apparatus from the establishment.

So the good news here for you is, that I'm not saying the US will stop trying maintain global order in the short or possibly even medium term. We'll still try, though that may be a continually losing effort where you live with regards to Russia and China coming in. We're certainly gonna give it a go. Which is one of the reasons I think we will be forced by some sort of crisis to change things up.

My argument is that in a perfect world for the American voter, we forgo some of that to focus on fixing our rapidly crumbling domestic house. And more specifically that that is a reasonable thing for an American voter to want and not racist or xenophobic as some would label it.
 

Kephalos

J.M.P.P. R.I.P. B5: RLOAI
Joined
Mar 2, 2009
Messages
730
MBTI Type
INFJ
Enneagram
5w4
I'm curious to see why you think US-Israeli relations aren't in good shape. I know the Biden admin has been palling around with Iran a little, but curious to hear your thoughts.
It's not just Iran, the new Israeli government and the Biden Administration have been publicly fighting since even before the Israeli general election was over. The behavior of the American ambassador has been most inappropriate, taking overtly partisan standes in favor and against factions in Israeli politics, so much ao that there have been accusations that the United States is giving money to the Israeli government's opposition. The mutual hostility (mutual hatred, I would say) between Benjamin Netanyahu and the Democratic Party (American liberals in general) goes way back to the Clinton Administration (the 1990s, that is), over Netanyahu's opposition to the much-ballyhooed Oslo Accords. They can't stand the man, in a word, and for now we have a Democratic administration in the White House.
 

The Cat

The Cat in the Tinfoil Hat..
Staff member
Joined
Oct 15, 2016
Messages
27,415
"War is a place where young people who don't know each other and don't hate each other, kill each other, based on decisions made by old people who know each other and hate each other, but don't kill each other... ” - Paul Valéry​
 

The Cat

The Cat in the Tinfoil Hat..
Staff member
Joined
Oct 15, 2016
Messages
27,415
Information operations abound.
Riddle me this: what's the difference between a russian talking point and a republican talking point?
Be aware of the information operations around you.
 

Virtual ghost

Complex paradigm
Joined
Jun 6, 2008
Messages
22,163
Information operations abound.
Riddle me this: what's the difference between a russian talking point and a republican talking point?
Be aware of the information operations around you.



WARNING:


Plus there are a few very important things that I would like to add here.
My local "comrades" that I was mentioning in the last few posts openly dream about complete mess in the USA. That the both parties will just kill each other and that this will be the end of the country. It is the idea that makes them wet and on my local forums some are even admitting that they are trolling US citizens. You go online, you call your profile Jack Barring, Jessica Hudson or X52 ... and then you pretend online that you are US citizen. What allows you to post disinformation while looking legit. While average American simply doesn't seem to understand that on the internet there are no borders. You are in the same bowl as everyone else.

The good example of this is me, in the case that I didn't say that I am not American the average reader here probably wouldn't really notice that I am not. My understanding of the English language and American culture are more than enough that I am can "toy" with US citizens online if I really want to. However I am not that kind of a person so I don't do that. Therefore I am kinda hiding behind my skills of English language but my genuine sounding is "Virtualni duh piše po psihološkom forumu redovito i sa dosta pažnje prema točnosti podataka. Tako da ne širi deziformacije. Mogao bi to raditi ali naprosto to mu nije u prirodi. Tako da svoje namjere na ovoj stranici nema namjeru mjenjati". Therefore if your skills of the English langauge are good enough and you know enough about the subject you can cast lies all over social media. Plus if you understand programs that manipulate pictures or videos you are basically free to do whatever you want. Which is exacty why moderation of social media has to be a thing. This just doesn't have meaningful alternative. Since in the end this is basically a form of border control and you don't want that just about everything can come in.

I understand free speech argument but if you let this slide you will have millions of Troyan horses all over the web. What in times when there are struggles between countries can be very good method of how to cripple someone from inside. Especially if the the targeted country is democratic in nature. What is because it isn't that hard to cause confusion or anger in the average person. Not to mention that it isn't that hard to organize local guoups that will continue to rise hell even once you are gone. Why is pretty much everyone here uhappy, because someone is deliberaly causing that out of political aganda. Therefore when you add all of that to the existsing problems people can get overwhelmed and then they become toxic for everyone around them. Threfore don't be fools and when it comes to politics ignore social media as much as possible. Since in that doman you basically have completely open borders.
 

Virtual ghost

Complex paradigm
Joined
Jun 6, 2008
Messages
22,163
Russians intensify blitzkrieg attacks in eastern Ukraine

Avdiivka, kinda incredible town. The place is on the frontline for over 9 years at this point but it still holds.
However the place still holds even if it is incircled by about 70%. So even much more famous Bakhmut can basically hide in comparson.




NATO forced to do the splits over support for both Israel and Ukraine

Zelenskyy arrives in Brussels for surprise visit ahead of NATO meeting

EU looks to boost secure submarine internet cables in 2024





It’s the EU and US against the rest of the world in new steel club

Finally, this probably has to be done in a number of other goods.
 

Kephalos

J.M.P.P. R.I.P. B5: RLOAI
Joined
Mar 2, 2009
Messages
730
MBTI Type
INFJ
Enneagram
5w4
@DiscoBiscuit

Lee Smith, Biden Sets Israel on Fire: Tablet Magazine.
By publicly putting its prestige and money behind the coalition that lost the latest Israeli election, Washington is openly advertising its desire to bring down Netanyahu.
Editorial Board, Biden Meddles in Israeli Politics: Wall Street Journal.
Mr. Biden’s intervention makes us wonder if his real goal is to stir more trouble for Mr. Netanyahu so his coalition falls. He may worry that the Prime Minister is increasingly focused on Iran’s progress toward becoming a nuclear power. And Iran is getting closer as it enriches uranium to ever higher levels, refuses to allow U.N. inspectors to look at suspect sites, and ignores international warnings.
Eliot Kaufman, The American the Israeli Left Loves to Hate: Wall Street Journal. (Unsurprisingly, the Democrats are not the only ones that do what I described).
Liel Leibowitz, America's Betrayal of Israel, A decade of perverse U.S. policy sets the stage for mass murder: Tablet Magazine.

Like I said, foreign policy recklessness and an inability to maintain a more or less neutral stance with regard to who wins or who loses elections in foreign countries, or bundling humanitarian or values issues (which have more to do with internal American politics or with the foreign policy of the current administration than with anything else) and traditional and long-term trade, military, and diplomatic matters can backfire (this is not the first time this has happened, and Israel is not the only country where we the United States has behaved in this reckless manner, and I bet this will not be the last case, because American diplomacy doctrine and practice is deeply imbued with interference in internal matters and bundling unrelated topics), sometimes by making relations with otherwise friendly countries antagonistic or even hostile, sometimes by creating chaos in the midst of a delicate situation for the other -- such as an emboldened terroristic threat.

It is also good to remember (because this happened almost ten years ago), that when Joe Biden was Vice President (and B. Obama was President), Benjamin Netanyahu also was in one of his periods as Israeli Prime Minister, and this was the time when Israel was getting in the way of one of that administration's foreign policy objectives, namely the "Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action" on the issue of Iran, its nuclear program, and its interference in conflicts in the Middle East.
 

DiscoBiscuit

Meat Tornado
Joined
Apr 13, 2009
Messages
14,794
Enneagram
8w9
@DiscoBiscuit

Lee Smith, Biden Sets Israel on Fire: Tablet Magazine.

Editorial Board, Biden Meddles in Israeli Politics: Wall Street Journal.

Eliot Kaufman, The American the Israeli Left Loves to Hate: Wall Street Journal. (Unsurprisingly, the Democrats are not the only ones that do what I described).
Liel Leibowitz, America's Betrayal of Israel, A decade of perverse U.S. policy sets the stage for mass murder: Tablet Magazine.

Like I said, foreign policy recklessness and an inability to maintain a more or less neutral stance with regard to who wins or who loses elections in foreign countries, or bundling humanitarian or values issues (which have more to do with internal American politics or with the foreign policy of the current administration than with anything else) and traditional and long-term trade, military, and diplomatic matters can backfire (this is not the first time this has happened, and Israel is not the only country where we the United States has behaved in this reckless manner, and I bet this will not be the last case, because American diplomacy doctrine and practice is deeply imbued with interference in internal matters and bundling unrelated topics), sometimes by making relations with otherwise friendly countries antagonistic or even hostile, sometimes by creating chaos in the midst of a delicate situation for the other -- such as an emboldened terroristic threat.

It is also good to remember (because this happened almost ten years ago), that when Joe Biden was Vice President (and B. Obama was President), Benjamin Netanyahu also was in one of his periods as Israeli Prime Minister, and this was the time when Israel was getting in the way of one of that administration's foreign policy objectives, namely the "Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action" on the issue of Iran, its nuclear program, and its interference in conflicts in the Middle East.
Having read your post and remembering things I have read in the past (its hard to remember everything given how much I follow) I do remember the Biden gov't and the US left generally having it out for the Likud party for some time. To the point that the recent protests around the supreme court changes proposed by Bibi and Likud are speculated to have had CIA fingerprints on them, something which can only be speculation but feels plausible (probable?) given the history of the CIA.

I've heard that the Biden admin and Dem's interest generally in Iran revolves mostly around Iran's natural gas reserves and a potential play using those reserves through the JCPOA (Iran nuclear deal) to further displace Russia's Gazprom from Europe. Interestingly Azerbaijan has a huge pipeline that Houston oil money is deeply invested into Halliburton etc. that could potentially carry this Iranian gas to ports and then to Europe.

I remember looking at how judges are placed on the Israeli supreme court and finding the process ridiculous, but can't remember more than that now.

Its been said that a lot of the pressure on Israel is from old feuds between the US left and Israeli right as you've mentioned but also a play to get a party in power in Israel that would be amenable to an Iranian gas deal (which is the ultimate goal of US establishment power brokers).
 

The Cat

The Cat in the Tinfoil Hat..
Staff member
Joined
Oct 15, 2016
Messages
27,415
More Republicans still supporting Russisa... weird how so many "America first" pubs keep carrying water for Russian interests.
 

Virtual ghost

Complex paradigm
Joined
Jun 6, 2008
Messages
22,163


Ukraine updates: Russians repelled in Avdiivka


Due to recent events it will go under the radar for the most part but it seems that the Russians just had a major debacle in Avdiivka. The place they are trying to take for many years. Since this was the front line city even before February of 2022.





European socialists suspend Robert Fico’s Smer party and its ally Hlas

Nice. To be honest I never really realized why European center left block took under their roof all those ex Communists from eastern Europe. These people are basically far right that doesn't go to Church.



German gas deal with Qatar under renewed scrutiny

The Saudi-Israel deal is in tatters

Hamas hate videos make Elon Musk Europe’s digital enemy No. 1

Scottish First Minister Humza Yousaf’s family stuck in Gaza and ‘terrified’

Baltic pipeline leak raises winter gas supply fears
 
Joined
Jul 24, 2008
Messages
22,429
MBTI Type
EVIL
Enneagram
5w6
Instinctual Variant
sp/so
I thought this article was interesting. I'd read things on social media to this effect but took it with a grain of salt because I find that, especially in the case of things that originated as Twitter/X/Threads content, it's easy for things to leave out a lot of context. Anyway, it appears to be from a real newspaper.


Most of the time, Israeli policy was to treat the Palestinian Authority as a burden and Hamas as an asset. Far-right MK Bezalel Smotrich, now the finance minister in the hardline government and leader of the Religious Zionism party, said so himself in 2015.

According to various reports, Netanyahu made a similar point at a Likud faction meeting in early 2019, when he was quoted as saying that those who oppose a Palestinian state should support the transfer of funds to Gaza, because maintaining the separation between the Palestinian Authority in the West Bank and Hamas in Gaza would prevent the establishment of a Palestinian state.
 
Last edited:

ceecee

Coolatta® Enjoyer
Joined
Apr 22, 2008
Messages
16,334
MBTI Type
INTJ
Enneagram
8w9
I thought this article was interesting. I'd read things on social media to this effect but took it with a grain of salt because I find that, especially in the case of things that originated as Twitter/X/Threads content, it's easy for things to leave out a lot of context. Anyway, it appears to be from a real newspaper.

https://www.haaretz.com is another good source for news in Israel and the region.
 

Virtual ghost

Complex paradigm
Joined
Jun 6, 2008
Messages
22,163
I don't sleep well and never have. But I usually manage ok. The last few days with Israel have seen multiple sleepless nights just following everything.

I remember my childhood in the 90's where everyone said everything would get better, and by and large everything did.

I remember 9/11 and being furious and shocked but it not settling in for me this would affect people I know.

I then remember going to college where a Fraternity Brother of mine ended up in Iraq and sent us a flag from the from the front. And another friend of mine who had been a Marine and taken AK fire in his trauma plate. I remember him not liking parking lots because of IED's, and the reaction he would have if a car ever backfired. He would go scuba diving in underwater caves to relieve the stress. I have an ex girlfriend whose boyfriend before me had died over there.

Even with all of that the world still seemed a wonderful place full of infinite possibility. Since 2008 with every passing year more of that optimism gets sucked out of me.

I hoped against hope that if only this time the right guys won, things would get better. And sometimes they did for a time, but those victories have always been pyrrhic. Just momentary lulls in the pace of everything getting worse. The policies enacted during the good times merely addressing to most obvious of symptoms resulting from the disease at our core while doing little to treat the cause. But the house always wins in the end in Vegas and so too in American politics does the establishment always win in the end. I frequently wish that I didn't love to follow politics and the world like I do. It feels like it has made me a less happy person. But I can no more change the love in my heart for following the process than I could change the love I had for a woman. 20 years of adult life has taught me that.

Which brings me to your "advantage". What I wouldn't give to have that childlike sense of wonder at the possibility that tomorrow would be better than today back. Which is what makes your account of how America has affected your life such a difficult knot to unwind for me. On the one hand I am deeply glad for the positive experience you have had from American and Western influence in your area. I suspect there are millions possibly billions of ones like it even if they might not attribute it to us as you so graciously do (and I'm sure its not only US and the west that contributed as local good decisions probably played a greater role in it). But at the same time its hard to not notice that that uplift you've experienced seems to have increasingly come on the backs of native citizens in the West.

What you see as something that has been done to US via Rus or China or whoever, I feel very strongly as something we have done to ourselves. Now there are portions of blame here and China and the Russians have acted as no angels not made things easier for US. But I think now and have always thought that the only people who could defeat US was us. And I mean that in the "great game" sense of struggles between nations and empires.

In the cold light of dawn that exchange of the quality of American life for international gains is not something I am comfortable making. Now whether one feels like this is something we've done to ourselves or something that's been done to us from outside would greatly color ones views. I wouldn't deem myself able to change your mind on that here. What I can tell you is that looking at the general decline of US politics as a consensus holding or making institution since 2008 and the decline in institutional trust tells me a story that I'm not alone in this country in my sentiments.

It would be right to say that I deeply wish we were still a country unified enough to rise to the current international challenges you articulate here. I really would prefer a strong US led global order. The world has worked better when that's been the case than it ever before.

But what you see possibly as something the US is still imminently capable of, I see as something we no longer have the domestic unity or economic capacity for. We can only print so much money/debt before the appetite for that debt dwindles (as it has esp. internationally) with fears that the US gov't is no longer a sound investment. We will probably be able to keep the ball in the air for a little longer, assuming things don't get worse with more conflicts opening up (which they probably will). I say we have until our funding for Social Security runs out which is expected to to be in 2033 but I expect to be somewhat sooner given the increasing deficits we've been running. When that happens the only issue that matters in American politics will be figuring out a way to fix our budget and get it funded.

In all likelihood we will still try to maintain the global order for as long as possible, unless some group of American politicians manages to wrest control of the whole gov't apparatus from the establishment.

So the good news here for you is, that I'm not saying the US will stop trying maintain global order in the short or possibly even medium term. We'll still try, though that may be a continually losing effort where you live with regards to Russia and China coming in. We're certainly gonna give it a go. Which is one of the reasons I think we will be forced by some sort of crisis to change things up.

My argument is that in a perfect world for the American voter, we forgo some of that to focus on fixing our rapidly crumbling domestic house. And more specifically that that is a reasonable thing for an American voter to want and not racist or xenophobic as some would label it.


I totally agree that you guys have to change plenty in how your country operates. In that department you wouldn't get any argument from me. However where you will get one is in the domain of how and what exactly needs changing.



When it comes to your claim that you did this mess to yourself that is partially and evidently true. In other words your country tried to make fiscally conservative society without socially conservatives values or the basic welfare state. In other words you need social conservatism to balance out the fiscal conservatism, since genuine family values, stability, loyalty to the country ... etc. should cut out the most vile and chaotic elements of free market. Or if not you can compensate with welfare state, what should patch things up for the most part. However you made the push to removes both mechanisms as much a possible and then you ended up complete social mess. While social media basically made sure that you can't really change your course and "inertia" is name of the game. This you made the system where your only real loyalty is to your business or your job. What is the life that lacks "stablity and valuse".


However through that you completely opened the door for hostile powers to rip you off, since all of this is what lead to mass outsourcing of the industry into autocratic countries. If you think that others aren't too much to blame feel free to research more on how much effort they made to take your industry. Which is basically the key because industry and manufacture basically keep economy grounded and real. Therefore without that you only have the so called bubbles and money without clear value. This is exactly why you have the impression that from 2008 everything is nothing but down. Since you don't have the industrial volume to restart the economic cycle. While trade deficits are out of control, since most of the stuff has to be imported. Which is why I blame "others" to big degree since they are trying hard to keep things as they are, what is quite big chunk of the equation at this point.


Also through out your post(s) I see something that I consider to be false picture of the world. Which is that you have to suffer for all of your friends and allies. Towards Debt clock US GDP is about 27.5 Trillion $, while military spending is only about 0.8 Trillion. Plus your international aid is only fraction of that. In other words your military spending is only about 3% of the whole GDP. While for example France has 2% and it has fairly decent amount of programs that are directly benefiting the population. What results with much more stable living for the population. Where is the trick ? The trick is that France and Europe in general are doing the other 97% of the GDP differently. However since your elites are either lazy or greedy they find it easier to blame the whole problem on someone overseas. If you watch the news from 20 years ago Europe even openly told you not go into Iraq since that will be a shit show. That was basically friendly advice, but you didn't listen since you had something else on your mind as country. While the pubic was still under impression of 9/11 and it played along. In other words in the media space you almost completely lack the detailed info of how your alliances with other developed countries are working (and that in my book is a huge problem that needs to be addressed). Basically you in the US have the news that are focused on the people who think that Africa is a country. Therefore some ambitious journalist can just sit in front of the camera and say almost anything he wants on foreign policy. Since he/she or the views don't know too much about the subject. After all they are constantly attacking Germany since it spends 1.5% of GDP on security instead of 2%. While they fail to mention that Germany has large programs that are focused on making various places good for a living. This is based on WW2 shame but someone has to do that part as well. Just shooting the bad guys wouldn't fix the place (streets in US these days are pretty decent example of that statement). While on the other hand media are basically completely skipping the countries that are spending that NATO target of 2%. Why they are doing that ? Because in that there is no outrage (and that brings the viewers in American culture).



However all of this isn't without it's practical problems. In other words I am from one of those places where the goverment is spending 2% on defence. What is especially because this is frontline country. In other words I am only about 50 miles away from the nearest Russia friendly tanks. So if some Repubicans want to take US out of NATO then I have to search for alterantives and different solutions. In other words if US starts retreating all of your ecnomy here in central Europe will loose it's support. What means that it will start to dry up in the case of most companies. Especially since in this case we now have to devert all money possible into our own economy, in other to boost our own defense further (since just 2% wouldn't be enough). After all in the case the whole US/NATO thing goes to shit for us we still have EU border to protect and we signed various contracts in this regard. After all if I lose US support I can't risk loosing EU support as well, since in that case things could get really messy (again). So if you retreat that isn't likely to bring any real benefits, you will loose infuence and reduction of your economy here will probably more than eat any benefits you got from retreat (and you deficits are already a mess as it is). At this point the only things that still generally works in US are the military and your cloud of alliances with other democratic countries. Therefore when you mess up even that there will be no way to patch the country. Since that means that your business around globe will implode, petrodollar will be gone, you will lose control over various recources, you wouldn't have a say in various places ... etc. And all of that just to have some savings on that few percent of GDP you are spending on defence or diplomacy. In my book this is simply the equation that has no chance of working out.



Also before this entire sub-forum got erased and restarted years ago I had the thread here which explained how and why I am totally ok with one idea. Which is that I put various engineers and builders on the pay from my national budget and then send them to US to repair infrastructure. Because someone has to do it before there is a meltdown. I live in a fairly heavy welfare state so to me it is totally normal to support others. I have zero college debt since the collective payed for that and due to that I probably sleep better than you. Also I or my family can't go into medical bankruptcy because collective purchesing power and defined rules are protecting me. What means that I am quite used to the co-op social model and I don't have a problem with extending the benefits on people like you. You extend your military umbrela over me and I will buy your goods and fix your infrastructure if needed. I am sure we can manage something out. I can go into more details of all this but I will shorten the story. Most of us from so called allied countries really aren't as ungrataful as certain media are portraing us to be.


Therefore in my view we are now in the era that is pretty similar to 1940s or 1960s, while the stakes are possibly even higher. Therefore I think that the democratic world should stick together. Some adjustments, ok. However massive watering down of our sum will surely create more problems than it solves. While the last thing we need is more problems.


I suppose these are my 2 cents on the topic.
 
Top