Totenkindly
@.~*virinaĉo*~.@
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2007
- Messages
- 52,153
- MBTI Type
- BELF
- Enneagram
- 594
- Instinctual Variant
- sx/sp
This show based on a comic book series dumped on Netflix on Friday. I watched the first five episodes today, there's five more to go. It's essentially about an incident where 43 women conceived mysteriously and gave birth in the space of a day (the same day), and an eccentric billionaire managed to adopt (aka "buy") seven of them and train them to be superheroes so to speak because most of them seem to have some kind of special ability. There's a bit of flashback but it mostly deals with them as adults, when they're all forced to reunite after abandoning their dad in adulthood. Each of them has a great deal of baggage from their childhood mainly because of how their father raised them (feeling more like test subjects than beloved children), so the series tries to address that to some degree.
My feelings so far are that it's a 7/10 series. Thematically (from the relational end) there's a similarity to "Haunting of Hill Place" -- that was also a show about kids with baggage from bad parenting, trying to heal -- but I feel like that show really dug a lot deeper and was far more nuanced. UA is definitely better than the final season of Heroes (for comparison) but just doesn't really know how to deal with the emotional elements in a really adult fashion -- it kind of dabbles around the edges, although there's some occasional good moments/lines (which I assume are lifted out of the comic).
It also has some style to it, which is cool... except it doesn't necessarily feel original, it feels derivative to some degree. Kind of like a show that wants to portray itself as original and ground-breaking but is kind of just playing off things other creative shows have done. (For example, the extensive use of music, some of which has appeared more notably in prior films or that sometimes "over-cheeses" the sequence, it's a bit too quirky.) This goes beyond style to also some of the plot points as well. There are a few "mysteries" (such as what's the deal with Vanya) that aren't really that mysterious because they seem to be playing out along the lines of what I was anticipating early on. There's been at least one character death that I saw coming from a mile away. I can discuss some of the specifics later in spoilers, to not ruin it for folks. But basically... it's fun but not quite as creative as it wants to be.
I don't want to complain TOO much because obviously I'm enjoying it enough to blitz five episodes or more in one day.... but it's not something I would probably rewatch. I think the Hazel and Cha-Cha characters have been really amusing; when I heard someone refer to them (as yet another knockoff) as Tarantino Lite, I immediately knew why they said that, but at the same time I still enjoy them in the series. The guy who plays Hazel is the same actor who plays Ed Kemper over on "Mindhunters" and I've enjoyed him on both shows now.
The actor doing the voice for Pogo (the humanized chimp) is the same guy who played Elliot on "Breaking Bad" and I've seen him in some other things. Meanwhile, the guy playing the eccentric billionaire (under the makeup) is a character actor I've seen in scores of movies -- the one I remember most is the head of the research lab from Face/Off.
The biggest name stars in the series I'm gonna guess would be Ellen Page (as Vanya) and Mary J. Blige (as Cha-Cha). The other actors are solid in their roles, and if they have trouble at times, it's the scripting and not them.
My feelings so far are that it's a 7/10 series. Thematically (from the relational end) there's a similarity to "Haunting of Hill Place" -- that was also a show about kids with baggage from bad parenting, trying to heal -- but I feel like that show really dug a lot deeper and was far more nuanced. UA is definitely better than the final season of Heroes (for comparison) but just doesn't really know how to deal with the emotional elements in a really adult fashion -- it kind of dabbles around the edges, although there's some occasional good moments/lines (which I assume are lifted out of the comic).
It also has some style to it, which is cool... except it doesn't necessarily feel original, it feels derivative to some degree. Kind of like a show that wants to portray itself as original and ground-breaking but is kind of just playing off things other creative shows have done. (For example, the extensive use of music, some of which has appeared more notably in prior films or that sometimes "over-cheeses" the sequence, it's a bit too quirky.) This goes beyond style to also some of the plot points as well. There are a few "mysteries" (such as what's the deal with Vanya) that aren't really that mysterious because they seem to be playing out along the lines of what I was anticipating early on. There's been at least one character death that I saw coming from a mile away. I can discuss some of the specifics later in spoilers, to not ruin it for folks. But basically... it's fun but not quite as creative as it wants to be.
I don't want to complain TOO much because obviously I'm enjoying it enough to blitz five episodes or more in one day.... but it's not something I would probably rewatch. I think the Hazel and Cha-Cha characters have been really amusing; when I heard someone refer to them (as yet another knockoff) as Tarantino Lite, I immediately knew why they said that, but at the same time I still enjoy them in the series. The guy who plays Hazel is the same actor who plays Ed Kemper over on "Mindhunters" and I've enjoyed him on both shows now.
The actor doing the voice for Pogo (the humanized chimp) is the same guy who played Elliot on "Breaking Bad" and I've seen him in some other things. Meanwhile, the guy playing the eccentric billionaire (under the makeup) is a character actor I've seen in scores of movies -- the one I remember most is the head of the research lab from Face/Off.
The biggest name stars in the series I'm gonna guess would be Ellen Page (as Vanya) and Mary J. Blige (as Cha-Cha). The other actors are solid in their roles, and if they have trouble at times, it's the scripting and not them.