I suspect this may be because, some how, Highlander IS bigfoot!!!
As with god, the only logical perspective on Bigfoot (or yeti or the Loch Ness monster, etc.) is agnosticism, until and unless sufficient evidence of its existence appears to justify acceptance (not belief).I do as the possibility is there. There is so much in this world we have yet to discover and besides I expand on the idea of innocent until proven guilty and that until there is solid proof he doesn't exist he exists in my mind.
As with god, the only logical perspective on Bigfoot (or yeti or the Loch Ness monster, etc.) is agnosticism, until and unless sufficient evidence of its existence appears to justify acceptance (not belief).
My point exactly. Natural phenomena like bigfoot are to be accepted based on evidence if it can be found, not believed in.There is a difference between belief and solid acceptance. Like we don't just believe in gravity or the Moon or black holes as the science world has evidence for those things.
I'm always fascinated by newly discovered species.
I want all of the bigfoots and Loch Ness Monsters and Chupacabras to be real, buuuut... the evidence just isn't there.
Aliens on the other hand...
You comma-hating dick-fuckers. She asked about Big Foot, not all this other garbage.