Mistyped TypeCentral Members

[Taibreah]

I just took the Jung Cognitive Functions test from Similar Minds and this is what I got. I don't know what to believe anymore, and I think I'm going to stop trying to find out.
If I had 5% more in Introverted Thinking, it would have been tied for INTP.

Te (Extroverted Thinking) (50%)
your valuation of / adherence to logic of external systems / hierarchies / methods

Ti (Introverted Thinking) (80%)
your valuation of / adherence to your own internally devised logic/rational

Ne (Extroverted Intuition) (55%)
your valuation of / tendency towards free association and creating with external stimuli

Ni (Introverted Intuition) (45%)
your valuation of / tendency towards internal/original free association and creativity

Se (Extroverted Sensing) (25%)
your valuation of / tendency to fully experience the world unfiltered, in the moment

Si (Introverted Sensing) (85%)
your valuation of / focus on internal sensations and reliving past moments

Fe (Extroverted Feeling) (55%)
your valuation of / adherence to external morals, ethics, traditions, customs, groups

Fi (Introverted Feeling) (65%)
your valuation of / adherence to the sanctity of your own feelings / ideals / sentiment
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
based on your results your type is likely - isfj

 

[Kasper]

I was wondering what would ya say makes me more 7 than 9?. I am at times very conflict avoidant and can withdraw from conflict but I also troll and fight for fun plus I get bored easily. Any good hints on how to find my tritype order as I am sure that I have 7 3 and 9 in some order.

If you're an ENTP then getting bored easily is a side-effect of Ne, it doesn't say you're a 7. On the other side 7s are not people who seek conflict so that's also not an indicator.

Two primary things to look at;

7s will chase the up to avoid the down, 9s will be satisfied with the okay and numb the bad.

7s are ID, 9s are Ego.

How do you tell if you are 6w7 or 7w6?.

Reaction to fear.

6s are hyper aware of it, 7s pretend it's not there and CHAAAARGE on.

 

[Galena]

Is there any chance in hell that a 4w3 with sx/sp would come across like me?

 

[Avocado]

ENFP's are supposed to be passionate people, but I don't give a crap about anything and serve no cause but my own. Must I be mistyoed?

 

[Agent Washington]

Am I an e5 or e7?

I love knowing shit. I do. I'm happiest when I discuss ideas in a healthy environment. And 5 disintegrates into 7, so maybe I id'd as 7 because when you're unhappy, you take what you can get.

But also... e7 sx has this rose-tinted-glasses. I'm always getting blindsided by people with bad intentions, because I just plain don't see them coming, even though I SHOULD know better from so many bad experiences.


Also, I'm pretty sure I have a 9 fix, but what about my heart fix? I can't see 1 that much, it's a tossup between 4 and 3.

I thought 4 because I can get depressed, but seriously, I've never really been out of an unhealthy situation and it's like. Meh. Now that I know what's the problem, I feel better already.

I'm thinking 3 because I do have this mildly ambitious streak, and I kinda do have the 3's core fear of not being able to accomplish anything.

 

[Agent Washington]

ENFP's are supposed to be passionate people, but I don't give a crap about anything and serve no cause but my own. Must I be mistyoed?

Look up Ne-Te loop and see if it applies?

 

[Avocado]

Look up Ne-Te loop and see if it applies?

not really

 

[Ghost]

[MENTION=33958]Scapegoated 4 fun[/MENTION].

 

[Forever]

[MENTION=33958]Scapegoated 4 fun[/MENTION].

I love you Ghost darling.

 

[Scapegoated 4 fun]

[MENTION=33958]Scapegoated 4 fun[/MENTION].

whut

 

[Yama]

[MENTION=33958]Scapegoated 4 fun[/MENTION].

What do you think his type is?

 

[Ghost]

whut

im sayin u mistyped. u hurrrd me.

What do you think his type is?

Uh. Don't know. I have a hard time picturing any TJ. I'm questioning the 5, too, although maybe that'd work with ISxP.

 

[Scapegoated 4 fun]

im sayin u mistyped. u hurrrd me.



Uh. Don't know. I have a hard time picturing any TJ. I'm questioning the 5, too, although maybe that'd work with ISxP.

What's your basis for disregarding the potential existence of a TJ preference in my personality? Or the enneagram 5 for that matter? Go on, speak up.

 

[Red Ribbon]

What do you think his type is?

ISFP 4. I am sure of this.

 

[Red Ribbon]

What's your basis for disregarding the potential existence of a TJ preference in my personality? Or the enneagram 5 for that matter? Go on, speak up.

You talk using big words as if that somehow makes you a thinker. (Disregarding the potential existence of a TJ preference? WTF?) You are also not nearly as objective as you try to be. Your value judgements are based on attraction repulsion, which is a sign of leading with Fi. I can understand if you think feeling types are evil you will hesitate to identify as one. You can also identify as whatever type as you want but here is my honest opinion.

 

[Scapegoated 4 fun]

You talk using big words as if that somehow makes you a thinker. (Disregarding the potential existence of a TJ preference? WTF?) You are also not nearly as objective as you try to be. Your value judgements are based on attraction repulsion, which is a sign of leading with Fi. I can understand if you think feeling types are evil you will hesitate to identify as one. You can also identify as whatever type as you want but here is my honest opinion.

Hmm, surely there must be a way to test this to find out once and for all. Is there maybe a question that you could ask me that only an INTJ would no the answer to, or only an INTJ would answer in a specific way?

- - - Updated - - -

...Your value judgements are based on attraction repulsion....

Your evidence to support this claim?

 

[Red Ribbon]

Hmm, surely there must be a way to test this to find out once and for all. Is there maybe a question that you could ask me that only an INTJ would no the answer to, or only an INTJ would answer in a specific way?

If only it were that easy. But like I said, feel free to identify as whatever type you want to be.

Your evidence to support this claim?

Go re read your threads. The evidence will speak to you

 

[Scapegoated 4 fun]

If only it were that easy. But like I said, feel free to identify as whatever type you want to be.




Go re read your threads. The evidence will speak to you

Yeah, you must not be familiar with either the INTJs tendency to troll, or the INTJs tendency to deliberately dumb down their thoughts in order to appeal to the average person's intellectual capacity. You can't take what someone writes on a post online and use that as a basis to type them, unless you know exactly what they were thinking when they put it down/why they put it down the way they did/whether they were being 100 percent naturally themselves when they wrote it etc.

 

[Red Ribbon]

Yeah, you must not be familiar with either the INTJs tendency to troll, or the INTJs tendency to deliberately dumb down their thoughts in order to appeal to the average person's intellectual capacity. You can't take what someone writes on a post online and use that as a basis to type them, unless you know exactly what they were thinking when they put it down/why they put it down the way they did/whether they were being 100 percent naturally themselves when they wrote it etc.

I know INTJs fairly well. You don't need to explain their behavior to me. Also there is no need for you to dumb down your thoughts. If you think a dumb sensor like me is not smart enough to understand, you can just avoid communicating with me. You will not hurt my feelings.

 

[Scapegoated 4 fun]

I know INTJs fairly well. You don't need to explain their behavior to me. Also there is no need for you to dumb down your thoughts. If you think a dumb sensor like me is not smart enough to understand, you can just avoid communicating with me. You will not hurt my feelings.

Nah, it's not sensors or you in particular, it's just a tendency I've noticed in people in general to reject information that doesn't have hints of emotional bias in it. Why? I don't really understand it either, but if I had to guess, it's probably because they are most comfortable with emotionally biased, "simple" explanations for things because they relate to it strays from being too heavy or deep, which would make them feel inadequate because they aren't used to having to analyze information on that level