Kingu Kurimuzon
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2013
- Messages
- 20,940
- MBTI Type
- I
- Enneagram
- 9w8
- Instinctual Variant
- sp/sx
These lists are highly subjective but fun to read. I agreed with most on this list (I love Radiohead but admit fans and critics tend to be too generous to them)--interesting that several had members who died young, therefore cementing some sort of legendary, untouchable status (Doors, Joplin, Sex Pistols, et al).
The Ten Most Overrated Bands Of All Time — Wax & Wane
my own thoughts
-Led Zeppelin? Fucking snore. I'm sorry, I always thought they were a second rate blues rock band. Page was a gifted session player, I'll give them that. Robert Plant is just Janis Joplin with a dick and testicles.
-Janis Joplin? Okay, she made it possible for women to be accepted as gritty, sexy rock stars alongside people like Jagger. Fair enough, she deserves credit for that. But I could never get into her music. I found a lot of the Big Brother and the Holding Company songs BORING--it's bar music. I'd rather just listen to Otis Redding or Aretha Franklin for superior examples of classic R & B. As far as female rockers pushing the boundaries in the 60s, I prefer Grace Slick of the Jefferson Airplane, who could, um, sing. Janis Joplin is just Robert Plant with tits.
-Nirvana? Punk rock in flannel, little more. Neil Young and Crazy Horse called and they want their sound back.
-Clapton? Same reason I never got into Zeppelin and Joplin. Cream and Blind Faith were alright. Layla is a decent album. Everything else he did has bored me to tears. A gifted sideman who should never have been a solo act. He has nothing on Jeff Beck. He might be better (technically) than David Gilmour and Syd Barrett, yet those two at least took their blues influence and transformed it into something sonically interesting rather than just playing copy and paste, watered down appropriations of far better blues players from the 50s and 60s.
-The Doors? They're not bad, but they're not the greatest. They were sort of the anti-hippie band, and I can respect that, but then I would say both Love and The Velvet Underground were more interesting bands in that regard, and did more than just white guy blues rock--both sadly underrated in their time, even if they've since become overrated by hipster critics in their own rights. Jim Morrison was just a glorified hybrid of Frank Sinatra and Elvis Presley. LA Woman and Strange Days are OKAY albums.
Some more not on that list:
-John Williams (OK he's pretty good, but how many Oscars does this man need?)
-Aerosmith
-Van Halen - Eddie didn;t even invent "tapping," so stop saying he did. Steve Hackett of Genesis and probably some classical guitarist I've never heard of deserve more credit for that.
-Pearl Jam
-David Bowie -
I actually LOVE Bowie but he owed A LOT to his contemporaries and forebears such as T-Rex, Dylan, Eno, Roxy Music, The Velvets and Lou Reed, Scott Fucking Walker, et al. He appropriated far more than he innovated and progressed, and that's perfectly fine, but let's appreciate him for being good at refining and popularizing fledgling genres rather than being some grand innovator. He had a eye and ear for what people wanted, what was on the horizon, and he knew when genres had overstayed their welcomes or become tired and stale (i.e. dropping glam rock before it became a novelty).
-Mozart - just because I think Haydn and Beethoven were better. Personal preference.
-Frank Zappa - dude, slow down with the releases. There's prolific, and then there's let's-spew-out-five-albums-a-year prolific. Plus, I dunno, the whole elitist, snobby, making fun of other bands thing was probably cute for a bit, but he did that his entire career. Respect him for his attacks on censorship in the 80s though. He was a prick to the Velvets, that never sat right with me. I dunno, I didn't see anything too innovative about his music--just a glorified mash of prog rock and jazz fusion, but I'm sure there's some Zappa fans ready to talk down to me and explain how his music isn't "for everyone"
-The Who
I know I'll get some flak for this, but they're just my opinions. Feel free to list your own overrated bands and mercilessly shred them.
The Ten Most Overrated Bands Of All Time — Wax & Wane
my own thoughts
-Led Zeppelin? Fucking snore. I'm sorry, I always thought they were a second rate blues rock band. Page was a gifted session player, I'll give them that. Robert Plant is just Janis Joplin with a dick and testicles.
-Janis Joplin? Okay, she made it possible for women to be accepted as gritty, sexy rock stars alongside people like Jagger. Fair enough, she deserves credit for that. But I could never get into her music. I found a lot of the Big Brother and the Holding Company songs BORING--it's bar music. I'd rather just listen to Otis Redding or Aretha Franklin for superior examples of classic R & B. As far as female rockers pushing the boundaries in the 60s, I prefer Grace Slick of the Jefferson Airplane, who could, um, sing. Janis Joplin is just Robert Plant with tits.
-Nirvana? Punk rock in flannel, little more. Neil Young and Crazy Horse called and they want their sound back.
-Clapton? Same reason I never got into Zeppelin and Joplin. Cream and Blind Faith were alright. Layla is a decent album. Everything else he did has bored me to tears. A gifted sideman who should never have been a solo act. He has nothing on Jeff Beck. He might be better (technically) than David Gilmour and Syd Barrett, yet those two at least took their blues influence and transformed it into something sonically interesting rather than just playing copy and paste, watered down appropriations of far better blues players from the 50s and 60s.
-The Doors? They're not bad, but they're not the greatest. They were sort of the anti-hippie band, and I can respect that, but then I would say both Love and The Velvet Underground were more interesting bands in that regard, and did more than just white guy blues rock--both sadly underrated in their time, even if they've since become overrated by hipster critics in their own rights. Jim Morrison was just a glorified hybrid of Frank Sinatra and Elvis Presley. LA Woman and Strange Days are OKAY albums.
Some more not on that list:
-John Williams (OK he's pretty good, but how many Oscars does this man need?)
-Aerosmith
-Van Halen - Eddie didn;t even invent "tapping," so stop saying he did. Steve Hackett of Genesis and probably some classical guitarist I've never heard of deserve more credit for that.
-Pearl Jam
-David Bowie -

-Mozart - just because I think Haydn and Beethoven were better. Personal preference.
-Frank Zappa - dude, slow down with the releases. There's prolific, and then there's let's-spew-out-five-albums-a-year prolific. Plus, I dunno, the whole elitist, snobby, making fun of other bands thing was probably cute for a bit, but he did that his entire career. Respect him for his attacks on censorship in the 80s though. He was a prick to the Velvets, that never sat right with me. I dunno, I didn't see anything too innovative about his music--just a glorified mash of prog rock and jazz fusion, but I'm sure there's some Zappa fans ready to talk down to me and explain how his music isn't "for everyone"
-The Who
I know I'll get some flak for this, but they're just my opinions. Feel free to list your own overrated bands and mercilessly shred them.