A few more points to be pointed out:
The claim that Science has even accomplished anything, is based on the weak claim that Science is valid in a separable way, in fashioning different parts to the presumed truth of "Science" (that correspond to spheres or levels of 'the total "scientific-reality"'); which is clear evidence that a fundamental feature of Scientific-dogma, is blind reliance (and bias) for the presumption in [the truth of] physicalism.
There is only one Science, and the source of any validity must come from some umbrella of sheltering validity, vindicated and rooted in the deepest study of 'physical observation'. Its trite, but worth spelling out: without being covered by the umbrella of physicalism, we can safely conclude Science has provided no answers in any question, only rendering itself useful in various technical respects (wherever Science has paved the way for manufacture or delimiting various kinds of guesswork in some kind of technical application (in the same way, a cook can know when the cake can expect to be ruined by an oven and how it might taste, by a rigor applied to reading his experience, not because he has the authority to know a full deterministic account for time and space)).
Now...
Scientific description of Quantum Mechanics is nebulous; but not only this, it is exactly nebulous to the exact manner that Science construes it's treatment of time through its methodology; anyone who dismisses this coincidence, is somewhat philosophically inept;- to say the least.
Summation:
If there is something, it can never have come from nothing;
And, something can be the displacement for nothing,
and thus, by scientific description, the full account of anything, is not a resolvable mystery.
Again: it's not a coincidence, that scientific description of quantum mechanics, mirrors exactly: science's treatment of time- the treatment woven into the structure of the scientific method. "Woven" in this context means hap-haphazardly presumed.
-----
The math-model does not determine occurrences, it can't, then any greatest statistical outcome must always prevail in some sense, and yet it can easily persist with no tangible expression, only by a Scientific-placebo-expression. The wave-form is just a projection cast by Science, it is in fact only the void of nothing, that nothing, always being then conforming to one-single displacement by something; something that has not come from statistics, neither through a statistic:- a position in favour of the statistics, can only be made reliable by extrapolating outside of the occurrence, or even further from the real empiricism, into a hypothetical empiricism (which is the deceptive-craft of the Science-domain).
Remembering whole virtual particulars are empirically manifest, not just the course of matter, that has already been taken for granted to subsist (and vulgarly accounted for under the guise/auspices of physicalism).