I just wanted to see some fireworks.![]()
That's in the old testament and perhaps taken out of context or misinterpreted. Without getting into a deep philosophical discussion, I'll simply say, the Bible is a love story and God is love. That's the big picture. Many Christians get it and some don't. The father in the article @<a href="http://www.typologycentral.com/forums/members/4050.html" target="_blank">ceecee</a> posted doesn't get it.
I just wanted to see some fireworks.![]()
I just wanted to see some fireworks.![]()
Someone in my house bought a Kay Robertson shower scrub (it has her characterized visage built into it) with which I scrubbed my balls clean. Felt good.
Context as in understanding the surrounding scripture; also, who is speaking in the scripture and to whom. There are also words that may not be properly interpreted or translated from the Greek and Hebrew texts; so if one was truly trying to understand the meaning of a scripture, they wouldn't take the denotation of every word (for face value). Some research into the Greek and Hebrew meaning of words and how they fit into the larger context is necessary for a complete understanding.I'm not sure what more context is needed in this particular case? "Oh, well that is the Old Testament" or "oh, those were different times" is a rather common response to situations like this. If the Old Testament is so contradictory to modern teachings, why is it still used beyond the book of Genesis?
I like your application of Christianity. It is much better than what Phil or most fundies I encounter spout anyway.I think that's abusive, and definitely not what the Bible teaches Christians to say to their children or anyone for that matter. Faith, hope, love... 1 Corinthians 13:4-13...
Love is patient, love is kind. It does not envy, it does not boast, it is not proud. It does not dishonor others, it is not self-seeking, it is not easily angered, it keeps no record of wrongs. It always protects, always trusts, always hopes, always perseveres.
Context as in understanding the surrounding scripture; also, who is speaking in the scripture and to whom.
There are also words that may not be properly interpreted or translated from the Greek and Hebrew texts; so if one was truly trying to understand the meaning of a scripture, they wouldn't take every word for face value and out of context. Some research into the Greek and Hebrew meaning of words and how they fit into the larger context is necessary.
So Deuteronomy (where that random quote was taken from) is essentially Moses speaking to the Israelites, as far as my knowledge goes. Correct? He is speaking about general rules and such. Again, I'm not sure how this changes anything. Surrounding passages speak of other rules.
? So if these words weren't translated well, then why does a better translation not exist at this point in time? This passage is the same in the translations that I have seen. I'm not sure how stoning someone to death would be ambiguous in any language.
*Edit* I have an exam soon. Please yell at me if I return to this thread before 15 hours after this post.
What is Phil Robertson even getting at with that flimsy metaphor? Is he implying that people who don't believe in a god are amoral and incapable of telling right from wrong? Then how does he account for the Five Precepts of Buddhism?
Certainly none of it changes the way sane, nonpsychopathic people would want to treat each other. Just because there are no god-given rules doesn't mean we can't choose to behave kindly and reasonably.
At least you can condemn it as a believer.
He continued, "We never, ever judge someone on who's going to heaven, hell. That's the Almighty's job. We just love 'em, give 'em the good news about Jesus—whether they're homosexuals, drunks, terrorists. We let God sort 'em out later, you see what I'm saying?"
The Duck Dynasty star made an intense and shocking speech at a Christian event on Friday in Florida where he created a hypothetical situation involving an atheist family that was meant to "show" that people who don't believe in an afterlife would make any level of violence would be OK and morally sound.
And what if I in turn created a hypothetical situation where catholic priests were having sex with small boys and they deemed it morally sound.
What percentage of prisoners are atheists?
[self-identified religious folks in jail]
Well I agree with that. Same as there is something wrong with this father that feels that speaking to his atheist son - “The reality is, you’re talking to a dead person.â€
I'm not really sure I understand this statement unless his son is comatose.