/DG/
silentigata ano (profile)
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2009
- Messages
- 4,601
They refute the narrative.
There is nothing to refute because there was no argument.
They refute the narrative.
There is nothing to refute because there was no argument.
There doesn't need to be an argument when there's a narrative.
That narrative exists only in your head, you poor soul.They refute the narrative.
They refute the narrative.
There doesn't need to be an argument when there's a narrative.
What narrative? I'm confused.
The statement was that there are more atheists + agnostics that participated in the poll than Christians. The statement was not about the United States. The statement was not about the world. The statement was about people on TypeC that participated in the poll.
Well sure, but in the end all movies are lumped together in the "fiction" category. We can enjoy them as amazing stories, but we acknowledge that they aren't true and it wouldn't make sense if they were all true because the realities contradict one another.
I'm afraid I'm going to have to agree with you here, geek.
HOWEVER, did you know that in India, Muslims make up 14.6% of the population? TypoC has 0% (as of this post) which means that India refutes the narrative here or something. So ya know............uh........ did I win?
This is equally true of the various religions: it wouldn't make sense if they were all true because they contradict one another.
All the religions can't be true but they can all be fictional.
So we employ exactly the same suspension of disbelief with the religions as we do with the movies.
To claim otherwise is special pleading.
Well then I really don't think this is what [MENTION=7785]Little_Sticks[/MENTION] meant.
This is equally true of the various religions: it wouldn't make sense if they were all true because they contradict one another.
All the religions can't be true but they can all be fictional.
So we employ exactly the same suspension of disbelief with the religions as we do with the movies.
To claim otherwise is special pleading.
- Mole.
This is what I meant:
Ah. I thought you were trying to explain Little_Sticks's beliefs.
Agnostic and Christian.
Was raised Pentecostal (very fruit-loopy Evangelical). I don't think it's possible to really know stuff about God and the universe, but I still loosely hold the beliefs I was raised with. Just I'm a socially and fiscally liberal, pro gay marriage feminist and I have serious reservations about the concept of hell.
Welp..I guess that makes me a fruit-loop lol![]()
I was accosted by a pentecostal catholic in Garema Place, Canberra, Australia the other day. And it was plain he was trying to entrance me. He had a well rehearsed trance induction. He was able to avoid anything I said and just proceeded with his trance induction.
Such a trance induction works well with the vulnerable, whether they are children or an emotionally vulnerable adult.
Fortunately I attended a trance workshop at the Australian National University, where, with my permission, I was given the suggestion that I would not allow myself be put into a trance against my will.
Trance abusers, like my pentecostal catholic, seek out the vulnerable to abuse, by entrancing them without their permission.
I mean that’s really out there lol
So is the poster.
I think he might mean "indoctrinated" though.
What is a Pentecostal Catholic? I was unaware you could be both Pentecostal and catholic.