That's a probably a feeling thing then, reading intention where there is none.
It goes back to a lesson we all should learn when first getting into typology. And that is, others may think about things differently than ourselves. But what I see instead, among the practitioners here who should know better by now, is the assumption that everybody operates from the same basic motives as oneself. So the thinking goes something like, "If I were to say something like that, it would mean X." Everything gets processed through our own personal lens or experiences.
Typology has the power to free us all from these misunderstandings, the misattribution of motives. And this is a very real and practical thing, not a game to play on the internet, or typing people we work with for the fun of it.
For example, back in 2006, about 6 years ago today, I was getting over a relationship with a woman who engaged in jealousy, extreme possessiveness, projection and displacement. While I was running around with the new woman (my future wife), I found myself reacting to her as if she was the previous one. But I didn't want the same relationship experience again and I knew from typological practice that this one was different in many if not most ways. I had to give her the benefit of the doubt.
So one day while we were driving home she was having a reaction to something that reminded me of my ex, and I wanted to habitually react to it. But instead, I thought typologically, and then I realized that she was not projecting or displacing - in fact, she was introjecting. It just happened to resemble these other reactions, because in my mind that's what I was so used to seeing.
I'll tell you, that understanding was very, very helpful in mentally/emotionally converting over to a new relationship, especially after being habituated to 13 years of the same old routine.
Based on these experiences, I think I'm really smart with typology and so I hate coming here and being treated like a dumbshit by those who don't practice what they preach, and who just treat this like a game, or who don't understand the practical side of stereotyping and just engage in knee-jerk reactionary bullshit.
Good quote though, I read that when I first replied to you and got a general idea of what your mindset might be.
Applicable speculation....
As long as there is no omniscience, everything gets the benefit of the doubt. It's just very difficult to overcome the habits of routine thinking and reacting.