Hi. I don't know if this helps, but you "feel" Ti to me.
I would go IxTP first for you, then maybe IxFJ.
Thank you
That was the original idea that I had. I was just so mind blown by the whole ISTP or INTP thing. Then I have feelings of INFJ occasionally. I'm an odd being. One moment I'm a concrete person, then I'm interested in talking about some theoretical wormhole and then I'm having a deep down conversation with an old lady.
Well I'm sure someone has already told you this, but ISTP has Ti/Ni and INFJ has Ni/Ti, so if you're not especially strong in your Se and/or Fe, or feel more balanced in your functions that might be why.
Have you read Jung? It really helped me to get a clear understanding of the difference of the functions. Since you seem to know you have Ti/Fe, if I were you I would focus on learning whether or not you have more of an Se/Ni mindset or an Ne/Si mindset.
That's right. Ixxx.
Excuse me, but Ixxx is impossible, because theoretically,
actually, I think you should label yourself using the colloquial four-dichotomy system just to piss everyone off
Just.. whatever you do, don't think that a type label's going to limit your capabilities, either. It's unfortunate that many people still feel that way, especially when they talk about people other than themselves, but, hey.. that's their problem.
You're an introverted porn star?
Thank you
That was the original idea that I had. I was just so mind blown by the whole ISTP or INTP thing. Then I have feelings of INFJ occasionally. I'm an odd being. One moment I'm a concrete person, then I'm interested in talking about some theoretical wormhole and then I'm having a deep down conversation with an old lady.
Occasional feelings aren't included for determining type. The best idea is to consider how you are most of the time.
Moving between concretes and theories is not an unheard of typological trait. The ISTJ in particular is known for showing interest in abstract topics even when there is no clear practical application.
Over-analysis of oneself or others is never a good plan for determining type.
Two things in there somewhat contradict. "consider how you are" and then "over-analysis is not a good plan"... well what do you want me to do? Haha.
NONSENSE. I just have a difficult time relating functions to myself.
Oh. Which part is nonsesnse--the joke, or the statement about how people tend to look at the odd ways in which people view others who they have typed?
Anyway, my spit in the coinbucket goes to ISTP for you, too, mostly from your treads, posts, and the video. You're also pretty cool, for what it's worth, and you should stick around
I may