You're an extrovert.
That's the definition.
–noun
1. an outgoing, gregarious person.
2. Psychology. a person characterized by extroversion; a person concerned primarily with the physical and social environment (opposed to introvert).
–verb (used with object)
4. Psychology. to direct (the mind, one's interest, etc.) outward or to things outside the self.
In this way, no, we're not alike. NFP means that you look towards the future, yes, but your extroverted nature makes you much more aware of immediate flaws by exposure to them on a frequency far higher than an introvert with be exposed to them. In this way, you, as an ENFP are much more likely to learn from mistakes because you will repeat them more often.
You're much more suited for relationships because you have more experience with them.
You may not think you are, but you are![]()
Oh I see. I may not think I am but I am
You are not more aware of flaws just because you are exposed to them. If that were the case, the most reckless people would be the wisest.
yeah...i'm just gonna go ahead and disagree with this post and that other one of yours...i am not present focused..i am not! and i do not learn from my mistakes! grr!
am I the only one unsure do I learn from my mistakes?! Does this automatically mean I dont?
If you're exposed to your flaws more often and haven't proportionally learned from them and fixed them, you're just stupid. As your example of reckless people not learning from their recklessness goes to show.
I can provide a video of a kid on a skateboard with an arm in a cast falling and breaking his other arm if you want...
Which leaves you with two choices:
Either you're more adept at relationships than your Introverted counterparts, or you're stupid![]()
Or your premise is flawed. Or you're right...and...*gasp*...some people are stupidI prefer the word unwise, but I could see myself using the same terminology in casual conversation, sure. Either way, I wouldn't use type to measure how much someone learns in life.
Or your premise is flawed. Or you're right...and...*gasp*...some people are stupidI prefer the word unwise, but I could see myself using the same terminology in casual conversation, sure. Either way, I wouldn't use type to measure how much someone learns in life.
What part of my premise is flawed?
Yeah, Moiety hasn't experienced a damn thing, 'specially to be an ENFP. I can't figure out why for the life of me.
I wasn't aware we ever met. Where do I know you from? Help me out here.
What part of my premise is flawed?
I'm not SAYING it is but I'm saying how it might be. The part where you assume Es are more likely to experience more for example.
The premise part.