strawberries
shadow boxer
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2010
- Messages
- 947
- MBTI Type
- ----
i don't throw rocks. i have something more scary! [chases intjs around offering hugs and frivolity]

i don't throw rocks. i have something more scary! [chases intjs around offering hugs and frivolity]
![]()
Wow. You just described every relationship I've ever been in. And yet I keep coming back for more. So to answer your question - yes, I have and yes, I would. But I kind of don't give a shit about myself like that.
What I want to know is how many of you would be willing to stay in a relationship where the other person doesn't show any signs of love towards you?
please elaborate. what are 'signs of love?' to you? i like my relationships to include affection, sex, talking, going on fun dates - inter alia.
Had a proper good *genuine* laugh just then. Who doesn't talk in a relationship haha. Have you realised for the how ever many years you've been alive that people tend to show their affections in a different way.
'Signs of love' for me would be: doing something I don't like for them, being careful with my words when I'm with them, wanting to impress them, thinking about them constantly and acting like a complete fool around them.
that aint love.![]()
No signs in the way your original post with subsequent posts seem to imply, meaning not signified in the typical way via physical touch or time together or verbal communication? Absolutely no signs would be true indifference, wouldn't it? Personally, I would be dissatisfied being in a relationship with those dynamics. I have a desire for sharing feelings and thoughts and experiences (general intimacy, I suppose) expressed in above listed methods. But perhaps I could fall for somebody like that.What I want to know is how many of you would be willing to stay in a relationship where the other person doesn't show any signs of love towards you?
BASED ON THE OPINIONS OF OTHERS ( YOU) ON HUMAN TOLERANCE NOT ME.
No one ever fell in love with Steve Urkel.
I know...Urkel was supposed to resemble the INTJ![]()
No one ever fell in love with Steve Urkel.
Urkel was supposed to resemble the INTJ![]()
I know...
I hate it when that happens
*hug*
![]()
Being an INTJ myself I've noticed that in any type of relationship I've ever had
I have not been able (or willing) to give back as much intensity as I've received.
What I want to know is how many of you would be willing to stay in a relationship where the other person doesn't show any signs of love towards you?
BASED ON THE OPINIONS OF OTHERS ( YOU) ON HUMAN TOLERANCE NOT ME.
Being an INTJ myself I've noticed that in any type of relationship I've ever had
I have not been able (or willing) to give back as much intensity as I've received.
What I want to know is how many of you would be willing to stay in a relationship where the other person doesn't show any signs of love towards you?
BASED ON THE OPINIONS OF OTHERS ( YOU) ON HUMAN TOLERANCE NOT ME.
In my opinion love needs to be earned not something that you can just give away based on how fun that person is, their looks or stupid stuff like that.
It takes a relatively long time (for me) to trust someone enough to let my hair down and want to do all of the 'fun bubbly' ExxP boring and irrelevant nonsense with them. *glares at Strawberries and Halla for throwing rocks at a 17 post member*
Wow. You just described every relationship I've ever been in. And yet I keep coming back for more. So to answer your question - yes, I have and yes, I would. But I kind of don't give a shit about myself like that.