Chloe
New member
- Joined
- May 1, 2009
- Messages
- 2,196
oh i'm just bored chloe i feel the obnoxiousness starting... sorry...![]()
Go ahead. Troll my thread all you like... ALL YOU LIKE!

oh i'm just bored chloe i feel the obnoxiousness starting... sorry...![]()
maybe like Robin Williams?
though I actually think he's ESFJ. :yim_rolling_on_the_
why do you think he's not sx? you think he's so/ sx? i could see that but i think he's totally an enfp tho.
hmm....you don't see ne hailstorms and tornados when he talks? he's like a lil mad person...he has this insanity that reminds me of my enfp dad kind of...but then again my dad also reminds me of jack nicholson which is also likely entj or estp or something not at all enfp like...hmm...my theories on this whole thing are shit...nevermind...carry on.![]()
Haha, yes, thats classic ENFP thing: share part of you to get other person share his secrets.But it's inocent manipulation, more like bonding, but yes, I admit, I [used to] do it as manipulation too, more uncosciously, or automatically.
you know...wait are you a 7? you're not are you...yeah...um...you're not likely to get me going deep in an interview either....unless you're really good and can somehow make me forget it's not just the two of us....7's can be sooo uncomfortable being vulnerable that it's like a juggling act of distraction...you have to some how firmly throw our lil balls across the room for us to just stop and get real with you...if it's hard stuff...and we don't know you well.
This is what I meant, I found NTPs to be bored by Fi talk. I mean it's logical, I am bored with Ti talk too, sometimes. I didnt say they dont want intimacy
Before you say that Fi doesent make decisions based on logic, it does most the time(if not always), but you just dont know it
Do you also have thing for bonding that when you talk to someone you cant wait to "cut straight to the juicy part" and get deep very soon? And feel that your conversation really only has meaning if you eventually get to that part? it doesnt only have to be verbally, it can be mutual understanding without stating everything loud.
Which types respond the best to this ? Which te worst? Did you notice anything?
I think TPs can often respond bad to this? Like... simply dont understand the need for this?
I mean, less understand than Fi's...
I don't see the need either. And when it is brought up makes me reconsider Fi. I can't think of much I'd rather not do than sit and have someone drill me on my inner feelings. That is just me.
What does deep mean anyway? Can you explain further. Are we having a deep conversation now? It feels kind of deep.
I just want to slowly get to know people by doing stuff.
Halla said:"I just want toslowlyget to know people by doing stuff."
I don't see the need either. And when it is brought up makes me reconsider Fi. I can't think of much I'd rather not do than sit and have someone drill me on my inner feelings. That is just me.
The best I can explain the feeling of bonding is when there some back and forth engagement. The key word is engaged, doesn't need to be deep though.
What does deep mean anyway? Can you explain further. Are we having a deep conversation now? It feels kind of deep.
well they all said in this thread that it has more to do with being SX in enneagram and not Fi, so maybe you're not sx dom?
No, we are notHm.. now thinking about it it means to me that I get to know who you REALLY are. And the feel for who you really are is if I know your deeper feelings and/or motivations.
![]()