GarrotTheThief
The Green Jolly Robin H.
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2014
- Messages
- 1,648
- MBTI Type
- ENTJ
Looks like creationists and big bangists were both wrong. Carbon dating, as we know using simple syllogisms, is not a valid way of dating. This article implies that carbon dating is only now becoming obsolete but logically speaking, if we were unaware of this issue, then how many more issues are we unaware of involving the accuracy and effects of our environment on dating using carbon.
Again, science today is an enterprise bordinger religion. Philosophy is still the logical king for discovering truth and constructing a model of reality. The scientific method is a philosophical tool first. Science has hijacked it to waylay funding and spending.
If we were truly scientific we would spend more money on raising human conciousness, and technologies that improve the quality of life.
As it stands, like Beavis and Butthead, instead we use our resources to improve and upgrade soft drinks and construct weapons of mass destruction.
Kudos to science...the enterprise...not the scientific method - distinguish between the two.
- - - Updated - - -
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/07/150720154505.htm
Again, science today is an enterprise bordinger religion. Philosophy is still the logical king for discovering truth and constructing a model of reality. The scientific method is a philosophical tool first. Science has hijacked it to waylay funding and spending.
If we were truly scientific we would spend more money on raising human conciousness, and technologies that improve the quality of life.
As it stands, like Beavis and Butthead, instead we use our resources to improve and upgrade soft drinks and construct weapons of mass destruction.
Kudos to science...the enterprise...not the scientific method - distinguish between the two.
- - - Updated - - -
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/07/150720154505.htm