I have read in the past that national governments have more in the way of intelligence than they could ever admit to without revealing their sources to scrutiny or possible compromise/assassination, I've seen good writing in television undercover police dramas which circulates around this very dilemma.
In some science fiction circles this dilemma is referred to as the "Dark Forest" theory, that is that the universe is a large "dark forest" full of Apex predators and the continued survival of any of its inhabitants depends on their remaining concealed/hidden from one another. This is why there has never been any "contact" or "first contact" as any species clever enough to master interplanetary travel would also have mastered remaining hidden in order to guarantee its continued survival.
My question is that if you were ever in a position where you suspected that "full and complete" information could involve jeopardy to yourself or loved ones would you want it? Would you be content with partial or incomplete information?
For the purposes of this discussion presume that your own survival and that of your loved ones or wealth or welfare or health or whatever is not contingent upon you ever possessing "full and complete" information. It would largely be about satisfying your curiosity/confirming your suspicions. It is not certain that it would jeopardize your and loved ones safety but it is a definite possibility.
In some science fiction circles this dilemma is referred to as the "Dark Forest" theory, that is that the universe is a large "dark forest" full of Apex predators and the continued survival of any of its inhabitants depends on their remaining concealed/hidden from one another. This is why there has never been any "contact" or "first contact" as any species clever enough to master interplanetary travel would also have mastered remaining hidden in order to guarantee its continued survival.
My question is that if you were ever in a position where you suspected that "full and complete" information could involve jeopardy to yourself or loved ones would you want it? Would you be content with partial or incomplete information?
For the purposes of this discussion presume that your own survival and that of your loved ones or wealth or welfare or health or whatever is not contingent upon you ever possessing "full and complete" information. It would largely be about satisfying your curiosity/confirming your suspicions. It is not certain that it would jeopardize your and loved ones safety but it is a definite possibility.