• You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to additional post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), view blogs, respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so please join our community today! Just click here to register. You should turn your Ad Blocker off for this site or certain features may not work properly. If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us by clicking here.

You Complete Me! An MBTI Romance

proteanmix

Plumage and Moult
Joined
Apr 23, 2007
Messages
5,514
Enneagram
1w2
Generally because if I open my mouth up on the forum about what I noticed I don't really feel like thinking about it any further than my initial observation.

Prompted by a thread I happened to open on this beautiful Saturday afternoon.

The thought has sprung to my head--it's been there ofttimes before but I'm just filling it out a bit now--that repeated like mantra is the fact the basing compatibility on this nebulous idea of type is should be taken with a Gibraltar sized grain of salt. But when I see people wanting certain types I'm thinking they want to conform the some type of romantic archetypes that are repeatedly played out in our culture. These can be roughly mapped to the expectations people seem to have regarding type compatibility and romantic relationships.

I notice that (n)FP/(n)TJ dynamic seems very Mary Sue in terms of the FP thinking they'll chill or thaw the arctic TJ heart. It's very romance book. I stopped reading them at 18. The FP/TJ dynamic can also turn quite sadomasochistic a la Secretary. Or the free-spirited FP will loosen up the buttoned-down business suited TJ. Also, the TJ controls the FP so firmly that her (yes her), only release is to paint, or write. Or the FP expects the TJ to bring some type of order to her(!) life due to her inability to consistently order her life in any functional way. Eventually the FP will come to resent this relentless control that she herself wanted at first and her desire to escape and involve herself in numerous romantic escapades will result in some torrid and ill-fated affair. Or she'll just journal and daydream about it. Or, various assortment of FPs are battling against some TJ machine to stop the destruction of a local wildlife habitat to make way for an upscale strip mall and somehow fall in love. But that's just a variant of the FP thawing the TJ heart.

I don't really find that same dynamic in the TP/FJ relationship although it could be going over my head. It seems like everything involving FJs and TPs has a mothering, finger-wagging overtone. At least the FPs and TJs get to have some sexual tension. Maybe there's some sexual tension if the FJ is semi witty and not clutching her pearls, fanning herself, and oh dearing about anything that comes out of the TPs mouth. More often than not I think the mythology and lore surrounding this is the FJ tries to get the TP to "grow up" and mature and take responsibility. Oftentimes, the FJ is an overbearing, ballbusting, status seeker and the TP is a schlumpy but good-natured guy or still wants to rock out with the band or follow his dream of being a hardcore rapper. In this incarnation the FJ will makeover the TP but he will eventually resent the person he's become: a TJ. Conversely the TP gets the FJ to loosen up and learn to laugh and enjoy life or some other such nonsense after she breaks the heel of her $750 pair of shoes in the rain and they fall in a muddy and coolant-filled puddle laughing hysterically. At best, the FJ is long-suffering and patient, always there to clean-up the TPs schemes gone awry. The TP may also be beaten into submission so thoroughly by the FJ that he becomes "Yes, dear" and asks the FJ what color and pattern of underwear is acceptable for him to wear.

FJ/TJ seems to be that overachieving power couple who cares nothing more than about their status: Luxury Car CHECK. Yacht decked at nearest harbor CHECK. Tony house/apartment/condo in upscale neighborhood CHECK. Children attending most expensive private school available CHECK. Powerful six figure job CHECK. Empty and loveless relationship CHECK. Uninvolved with children other than what they achieve CHECK.

FP/TP I think is far less severe mostly seeming like the laid back couple who are lovable goof-ups. Irresponsible but that's OK! Each thinks the other is a cool gf or bf or wife, husband, or partner. Problems only arise when the extroverted judging world impedes upon their lives by asking them to mow their lawn because an unidentified animal attacked a neighborhood child. (Un)fortunately for them it was the FJ/TJ's kid and they intend to prosecute to the fullest extent of the law. If the child survives, he (yes he...he is an FP who was in the process of running away from the TJ/FJ home. The lack of warmth was killing his soul and he just got cut from the junior varsity Golf team) will write the next great American novel based on his upper-middle class but void existence. He now resides in Soho, NYC with his ambiguously classified "life partner" who is also a writer. His memoirs are now a major motion picture starring Kate Winslet and Joaquin Phoenix. He doesn't give interviews, please contact his literary agent.

Then we can break it down into FP/FP, TJ/TJ, FJ/FJ, TP/TP but I don't have enough archetypes immediately available to me right now.

Basically it seems to me that stereotypically the FP/TJ and FJ/TP has that ooey gooey Jerry McGuire "You Complete Me" mawkish goop entrenched deeply into people's minds with little deviation. You can see this echoed on the forum by the numerous IxTJ/ENFP threads and ENTP/INFJ threads.

Are these archetypes mere fantasies or are they a mirror of reality?

Yeah, I really hate romance movies and that's all that seems to be on on the beautiful Saturday afternoon. The life of an extrovert with nothing to do is a sad one.
 

Tallulah

Emerging
Joined
Feb 19, 2008
Messages
6,009
MBTI Type
INTP
I don't have a lot to add, but I enjoyed reading this, pm.
 

jaku

New member
Joined
Dec 18, 2008
Messages
65
MBTI Type
INFJ
Enneagram
4,5?
your life may be sad, but my life is much better now, having read your post.
i thought for a while i was just laughing inside my head but then i felt my body moving.

Whenever I contemplate dating and serious relationships (comparing myself to those around me, friends and otherwise) I run through a series of thoughts much like your post.
I imagine up certain 'flavors' of individual (based on comprehensive people-studying knowledge from my mind archives) and pit them against one another and see how long, in my mind, it takes for the relationship to pass the euphoria-like, happy, growing part and proceed to completely disintegrate into the original ingredients of the relationship. a week. month. months?
always taking my current life situation and events into account, it never lasts more than a few months. and half that time is the disintegration period and not any sort of maturation or growth or happiness involving the other party.

I try and explain this to my friends and they tell me it's a depressing outlook on relationships.
What I think is actually depressing is how depressing it is to think about the presently unattainable ideal relationship.
or even the idea of a relationship I could entertain on more than one occasion.

So then I think I'm not surrounding myself with the right people.
But I like my friends and acquaintances. And I carefully choose who I surround myself with. And I respect them for certain qualities and not others while I learn to love them for who they are but some of them seem to unwittingly ruin my hopes for discovering a truly meaningful one-on-one relationship by consciously (i think its conscious?) playing these roles and conforming to these ways like they are the only (ways). They tell me 'it's different than it appears from the outside'.
And then the two part ways a month or two later and I don't even get a follow up because they don't want to talk about how hard the breakup was.
So I get mad knowing all the people in romance novel relationships and how unhappy they truly are when they're not having sex.
And now I'm feeling a bit angry toward romance novels.
that anger misdirected? It's only a bit, not too intense. More upset and bothered, than enraged. ...I don't think I feel anger much.
I do feel a lot of things, though.
Like love.
Somebody let me share it with them, openly and honestly.
Remind me not to watch television on Saturday afternoons.
The life of an introvert with nothing to do is a sad one...
infjramble -out

...maybe one-on-one is not the answer?
why monogamy?
I can love anybody, I think.
I can't think any more, though.

thanks for the insightful post.
insmellful
intouchful
intasteful
insoundful too.
 
Last edited:
Top