Virtual ghost
Complex paradigm
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2008
- Messages
- 22,165
This is sort of my point "You know there was one Te thread earlier this year". On the other hand no one even counts Ni threads anymore.
I will answer your specific questions later, but for now I think you have identified one part of why not much is said about Te: pretty much everyone knows the basics about it. It is much less mysterious than, say, Ni. I have even heard Te described rather pejoratively as the "least common denominator function", as if to deny it has any depth or ability for nuance. Without getting into the accuracy of that characterization, I can say that the relative straightforwardness of Te is its strength. It is concerned with objective aspects of external reality, things all of us can point to and measure. In short, the "facts of the matter". If we cannot at least agree on those, then we cannot productively move on to interpretation, valuation, elaboration, and those supposedly deeper and more nuanced thought processes. Te, regardless of where it is in our function stack, helps us all get on the same page.
I can merge the threads if the OP wishes.
If you insist ok. However I wanted a clean start since I have pretty big plans for this thread.
If that is not the case I would simply resurrect one of my older Te threads.