[NT] Who are more "robotic": INTJs or INTPs?

[Nicki]

INTJs

INTPs are too harmless to be considered robotic.

 

[10blackroses]

Maybe a thread about: "who has the better grip on reality - an INTX or a stone ?" would be in order one day

INxx, in that case My moments in Feeler Land don't make my sense of reality much better

 

[111]

Try being here for more than two days...

I took your advice, and three years of contemplating this whiny thread later you still sound like a mere human.

...you sound more like a young, immature INTJ...

I seem arrogant, irrational, and emotional so I must be an INTJ? What was it that we were disagreeing on, again?

 

[BadOctopus]

Wow. Super-necro'd.

As for the question in the OP:

INTJs are humans disguised as robots.

INTPs are robots disguised as humans.

 

[Kingu Kurimuzon]

apologies if this was already shared.

 

[Opal]

INTP > INFJ > INTJ

 

[Xann]

Depends on the level of asperger syndrome more than anything, which seems to be over-represented amongst these two types for whatever reason (probably from the appeal of reading at a young age which would result in less mirror neurons in general in adulthood, is my theory).

 

[Riva]

I can remember this thread. It created some drama with the OP.

I took your advice, and three years of contemplating this whiny thread later you still sound like a mere human.

I seem arrogant, irrational, and emotional so I must be an INTJ? What was it that we were disagreeing on, again?

I am ashamed to ask this - who are those (two star trek?) characters? I know I've seen them but can't remember from where. Episodes or the names would be great.

 

[EJCC]

 

[Kingu Kurimuzon]

I am ashamed to ask this - who are those (two star trek?) characters? I know I've seen them but can't remember from where. Episodes or the names would be great.

Gnarls Barclay and Lt. Saavy....kidding.

It's LT. Barclay and LT. Saavik (she was portrayed by Kirstie Alley in STII, then Robin Curtis in ST III and ST IV)

 

[Riva]

Gnarls Barclay and Lt. Saavy....kidding.

It's LT. Barclay and LT. Saavik (she was portrayed by Kirstie Alley in STII, then Robin Curtis in ST III and ST IV)

Thanks

Oh yeah Baclay I can remember now very well. I still can't remember seeing Saavik. I hope I can still call myself a true Star Trek fan.

 

[Kingu Kurimuzon]

Thanks

Oh yeah Baclay I can remember now very well. I still can't remember seeing Saavik. I hope I can still call myself a true Star Trek fan.

Meh, I always thought the Saavik character was a bit overrated. She wasn't really written as her own character but as a sort of foil to the main trium of Kirk, Spock and McCoy. Perhaps the writers intended her character to be representative of the "next" generation of starfleet. She's interesting, but they didn't explore her character too much beyond the surface. I believe the film novelization of Star Trek II mentioned she was half-Romulan. Apparently she was meant to be in Star Trek 6, but the writers changed the character to Valeris.

 

[C.J.Woolf]

As for the question in the OP:

INTJs are humans disguised as robots.

INTPs are robots disguised as humans.

Another one deceived! INTPs are awkward humans who try to pass as robots.

 

[Julius_Van_Der_Beak]

Another one deceived! INTPs are awkward humans who try to pass as robots.

In other words, they have a lot going on, but they hide it?

 

[Ene]

I don't think either are as robotic as they'd like people to think.

I've seen INTPs have emotional fits and get depressed. I've yet to see a robot have an emotional fit or get depressed. Then again, I've yet to see a robot that can truly think and make decisions for itself...so, I guess we have to go with theoretical robots. Data isn't a robot. He's an android and, well, you know, that's different.

I've seen INTJs get excited and gloat, eyes all lit up, betraying their inner glee. Robots don't have inner glee. I've also seen an INTJ get "mad." Yessirree, MAD and then plot, plan and execute revenge. Robots aren't capable of getting mad.

So, I vote that both come short, thank Heavens, of being robotic.

 

[andresimon]

INTJ's are more robotic. Not only are they more robotic but their NI +TE combination can AT TIMES be very dangerous. Some often feel more in control and predictive of situations then they really are. Hence the emperor complex. INTP's for the most part are theorists and their secondary Ne functions makes them fun to be around.

 

[Luke O]

Neither. We just express our humanity in different ways.

 

[Kanra Jest]

Depends on the level of asperger syndrome more than anything, which seems to be over-represented amongst these two types for whatever reason (probably from the appeal of reading at a young age which would result in less mirror neurons in general in adulthood, is my theory).

I had mild aspergers growing up... Corellation?

 

[Xann]

I had mild aspergers growing up... Corellation?

Definitely, it either wouldn't have been obvious if you were for an example an extraverted sensor or it may never have developed at all in the first place. There is a lot of literature on this out there if you are so inclined to search for it, although you may have to read between the lines to realize what they are actually describing has to do with manifestations described by the MBTI and not solely the autistic spectrum's affecting of a blank slate.

 

[Mademoiselle]

Oh God.
They are warm humans, the rest of you are cotton candies.