Stop blaming everything on Communism. Looks like you misunderstood me, but I'm no fan of Communism - I'm completely neutral, in fact. It's not Communism itself that's hurting Chinese people, it's the people with power - Communism is a CONCEPT, a THEORY that actually has little to do with the idea of oppressing people. The definition of Communism originally centers on property rights, not oppression. I really wish Americans would look deeper into Communism before getting all rowdy about it.
Ideas have consequences, and the (unsurprising) consequences of attempting to implement communism have been pretty consistent. One would think a Korean would have better understanding than most on this point, but I guess not.
As for no one being oppressed in China....we must have drastically different notions as to what constitutes 'oppression'; to name the most obvious victims, there are Christians, Tibetan Buddhists, Falun Gong practioners, democracy supporters, people who would actually kind of like to write or say what they want without fear of police-state persecution, anybody who wants to have more than one or two kids....
I guess people who don't consider what the aforementioned groups (as well as others) go through to be 'oppression' disturb me.
The only reason I really dislike Communism is that it promotes a certain level of power in the government that is easily abused. Otherwise, the concept itself is a wonderful one: everyone gains from the government holding all of the property and theoretically distributing it equally, meaning that no one is in a state of poverty and everyone has what they need.
People not knowing that communism is a dictatorship disturbs me.
Communism doesn't involve dictators.
They may not be completely aligned but they both desire control. And a lot of communist country's in the past have had dictators. So I think what I said is justified![]()
How can a political theory "desire control"?
Communism, properly understood, does not involve any government, and certainly not a dictator. There has never been a Communist government or state, and indeed there cannot be: Communism is as much an ideology about statelessness than it is about classlessness. That certain tyrants of the past have declared themselves communists is clearly irrelevant to this.
What you wrote makes absolutely NO SENSE to me.
And it sounds more like your own personal opinion than anything.
If communism is an "idea" your basically saying its theoretical and doesn't exist.
And if you don't believe it exists than I think you need help, or to seriously dig into history.
What is unclear?
My understanding is common, and completely uncontroversial.
If Communism isn't a political theory, what else is it? A type of doughnut, perhaps?
I don't believe any current society is communist, though there may be an obscure tribe somewhere which proves me wrong. I cannot think of any historical society which has been communist.
Also, I recommend you don't insult me further: you'll elicit an identical reaction from me, only my insults will upset you.![]()
Maybe communism in its purist form has never been fully implemented. But to say it doesn't exist currently and never has existed is insane and your personal opinion. Nazi Germany, the former soviet union, the state of Iraq before bush declared war, China (currently), and maybe even Venezuela for is up for debate. And I wasn't insulting you, I was just giving you some much needed advicebut I'll be the bigger person and say I'm sorry for hurting your feelings.