Galaxy Gazer
New member
- Joined
- Dec 27, 2015
- Messages
- 941
- Instinctual Variant
- sp/sx
That is completely anti-Ubuntu.
"It started by abstracting the female from her social roots which feminists construe as a form of bondage." Do you agree that this is how it went?
'women started using the prefix "Ms." because a relationship status should not define a woman any more than it defines a man.' It was more than just the title, her entire name was defined by her relationship to a man, for example, "Mrs. Darren Stevens." This was more than just a social custom denoting marriage, it also indicated that she was a virtuous woman according to the moral terms of her culture which is deemed by feminists to be male-dominated and unequal.
But as you've observed, social customs (or "archetypes") applied to both sexes:
"Why do women have to be social and family-oriented? Why do men have to be career-focused and good leaders?" So there actually was equality because each gender had social roles placed on them, it's just that the roles were different. To say that women should be equal to men simply means, as I've observed, that women should be social, family-oriented, career-focused, and good leaders. The modern female needs to be a little bit of everything, both male and female. This is the result of your feminist push for gender equality. Instead of giving women freedom of choice, feminism has placed more burdens on women.
Burdens? No. More like responsibility. I mean, men have always had to balance full-time careers with family. Why shouldn't the same be expected of us?
Honestly, I'm not entirely convinced that you don't just have a personal preference for more traditional women.