Speaking as someone with almost no experience with kids since I was one myself...I'm sure this thread has been done before so please point me to it if it has.
My question is, at what age can you effectively and accurately type a child? I have 2 children, ages 4 and 5. Is that too young?
According to Barron and Tieger in Nurture by Nature, "For most children, all four of their preferences are apparent and identifiable by about age 3 or 4. In some cases, whole types are clear by age two. With still other children, it takes more time - perhaps until about age 5 or 6 before their parents are really sure."I'm sure this thread has been done before so please point me to it if it has.
My question is, at what age can you effectively and accurately type a child? I have 2 children, ages 4 and 5. Is that too young?
The general belief, I think, in MBTI is that children develop their primary functions first. The others tend to fill in later. Others think that you tell orientation first, but the actual preference doesn't emerge first (ie: x--x).
In my opinion, what you can tell mostly only the I/E, and any strong existing preference that is unlikely to change. In reality, I suspect that these things are influenced by environment, so the majority can show shifts in and out as they grow up. (Lets face it, teenagers do not behave quite the same as "normal" humans).
The answer, however, is "Yes, it is too young to be confident in any typing". Doesn't mean you can't gain from doing it, but don't assume it is true or will remain the same.
According to Barron and Tieger in Nurture by Nature, "For most children, all four of their preferences are apparent and identifiable by about age 3 or 4. In some cases, whole types are clear by age two. With still other children, it takes more time - perhaps until about age 5 or 6 before their parents are really sure."
That said, I suggest parents keep an open mind since most children develop their dominant function around age 6 and their auxiliary function around age 12. This is something Barron and Tieger point out in another book, Do What You Are.
The general belief, I think, in MBTI is that children develop their primary functions first. The others tend to fill in later. Others think that you tell orientation first, but the actual preference doesn't emerge first (ie: x--x).
In my opinion, what you can tell mostly only the I/E, and any strong existing preference that is unlikely to change. In reality, I suspect that these things are influenced by environment, so the majority can show shifts in and out as they grow up. (Lets face it, teenagers do not behave quite the same as "normal" humans).
The answer, however, is "Yes, it is too young to be confident in any typing". Doesn't mean you can't gain from doing it, but don't assume it is true or will remain the same.
I dunno, my "ENFP" ness was pretty obvious/apparent from a young age.
By five or six one would have been able to accurately assess my personality.
If anything, I displayed more charactersitically ENFP traits when I was younger, than I do now.