1487610420
Permabanned
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2009
- Messages
- 6,418
I relate...oh wait...i am not INFP. I just relate to assumptions about STP types. Especially when i know our weaknesses, our fears, our goals, our negatives. I have said it before.
My take is that unhealthy INFJ will take on qualities associated to INFP in a much more negative way. And an INFP take on qualities associated to INFJ in a much more negative way. You can apply that to pretty much all type.
The crappy ISTx descriptions i will fit half of ISTJ and half ISTP. They suck and honestly people dont care to really dig much deeper into it then shallow impression vs a better seperation. It requires a bigger picture of stereotype, not always more in depth of a person.
Its not just your type.
INFP are caring, sensitive people who can turn "bad ass" when pushed.
Most people only see what affects them and dismiss the rest. That creates alot of people that dont see the full picture.
You first.
This was not the response I seeking/anticipating. *mental note*
No way. Really?![]()
You summed this up perfectly. I couldn't have said it better myself.
After getting into mbti for a few months and seeing all these assumptions based on individuals because of their type, you can say I got fed up and needed to rant which was why this thread happened.
I have to learn to stop taking these personally, not let them affect me as well as to move forward and prove people wrong.
Despite not being INFP, it was kind of you to stop by and added in.![]()
Oh, okay... I've heard some put-downs, i.e. that the majority of folks on the autism spectrum are INTJs (doesn't mean all INTJs are autistic), and that INTJs are black-and-white thinkers; cold rationalists unable to look at the big picture or to have much empathy for others. Then again, I am still learning the nuances of each type. I am partial to the Enneagram, to be honest. It's a little more broad of a system; less stereotypical. I am frankly more at home discussing enneatypes, and it's quite interesting to me how they correspond to Myers-Briggs types.
There's nothing wrong with being "soft," OP. Gentleness is a highly undervalued trait in our Western world. Many of us are rather good at appearing quite tough on the surface, kind of like a poached egg. Peel away that hard-boiled exterior, and you've got a gooey, scrumptious center, radiating pure love and light..."Sunny side up!" Peace, hope and unmitigated joy are what we impart to others when we're allowed to thrive and be at our best. Some of us are just a little more "hard boiled" than others because of hurts, hangups and the hand dealt to the INFP in a rigid society.
Our fellow INFP Kurt (I know, not female haha) was one such person... a sensitive, beautiful soul. Even though he ultimately couldn't feel content with his own life, it was that very same "softness" and emotionality that touched millions, if not billions of lives. His music still speaks to the kids of today. No, he wasn't a theoretical physicist, but I find that many everyday intellectuals are not always the highbrow academics or the brainiacs working in some highly technical field, but those who have high emotional intelligence and just the right mix of street smarts and philosophical intuition.
INFx folks are not robots, nor are we Stepford wives... deal.
"and to remain soft"
I hate to be this person, but this right here is another thing.
The generalization that us INFPs are inherently 'soft.'
Fwiw, I've felt some version of this phenomena as a Te-dom. There are just as many patronizing beliefs regarding the emotional depth and maturity of someone with inferior feeling (which some go so far as to call "Baby Fi") as there are regarding the self-possession and reasoning ability of someone with inferior thinking.
On a typology site, the fact of the matter is that how you choose to identify type-wise can lead other people to make certain assumptions about your actions or motivations. It's sloppy thinking, but it is what it is. If you fall too far outside of what their conception of the type is they'll simply label you as mistyped. Again, that points more to the quality of their insight than your own self-knowledge.
All typology system are are a model for better understanding your own patterns of behavior--not an indictment. MBTI has given me the language to describe potential areas for growth in myself, some inkling as to why I struggle in those areas, and some direction on how to address them. I don't expect any generic description (no matter how vetted or well thought out it is) to fully capture me.
This is one of the strongest reasons why I have had such a hard time with my type. I am not a strong "feeler" and many of the descriptions I just didn't relate to. I align more with the INTP as far as how I display my feelings and how I feel internally. But I know I am not T.