i normally warn people against learning technique, because often times they too dependent on it for their art and become stuck, and don't know how to get in and out of the thing.
technique is just a learned thing. you do it over and over, then one day you will "get it" and then it will be easy to do. it is not hard to do, it just takes focus.
the problem is that it is so easy to do, that people will instead of imagining up new ideas, "borrow" something that's already been done.
i think technique can become a confidence trap, when person get stuck on the technique only rather than the heart, they don't produce anything new and interesting.
Yeah, I totally agree. Sometimes I go through a (technically) amazing art gallery online. The artist has painted manga or something like that for their whole life, and it is so obvious that while their work is incredibly well done, it's the highest they can go. The only way they can make it better is to keep making it technically more demanding, but there is a limit there as well. And it will be hard to just start from the scratch with any other techinique. The compositions keep the same "graphic design school" perfect look. It's not very interesting (I mean, come on, there's something like four different types of compositions you can make if you keep doing that

). The "wow" factor there is that they really are masters of their technique, and I can never be that. Of course, I don't even want to, since I get bored with one technique. Not much thinking otherwise. I love that part of the creation when I hit the wall and the style didn't work, but I sit around, watch the painting, smoke a cigaret and then I get an idea how to get around the road block. Other than that, I think that the mistakes I make are really the only times I learn anything important.
but if you are sincere, that is a different story. i think both ways are fun. it's fun to be yourself but it can be fun to pretend to be something else - or even many things at once! a pretentious artist is never regarded well, but i think they are innocent and just wanna have fun. still, i feel the most honest artist is the most interesting.
This is an interesting aspect of art I've been thinking about lately. I mean, the stuff I do, sometimes it is about some metaphysical symbol that I don't know myself what's it about, and sometimes it is a cartoonish fox swimming. They both are sincere expressions of something, it isn't like one of them has more value to me than the other. Joking can be sincere, and "deep" can be done with not much heart in it at all.
The differences of value come from many things. The fox, I made it after meeting a fox several times while walking in the forest by the shore at night. I think of it a bit like my totem animal now, hah! Technically it is more clean than most of the paintings, but if falls short of the more symbolic work because it isn't done with the same freedom. Like, this other one I have. I made a really nice looking circle on the canvas (you know those zen circles?), and liked it so much I almost stopped right there and said it is ready. But then I continue, and paint another smaller circle. It didn't go so well than the first. I start doodling around the big circle, and start to think of the big circle as the earth and the small circle as the moon. I paint some plants and stuff on the big circle, and a piece of sky to reach for the moon. I leave a big chunk of the canvas empty, and the way it is now, the finished painting, it is nothing like I thought when I started, and it might look like I "ruined" a perfect circle, but the value in it for me is that the process of making it was unique that I can't possibly repeat it, and the symbolical meaning of the empty circle in the midst of all the "goings on" around it is something I like very much. Like, the world is the forever now in the zen sense, and then there's just a load of stuff around it that almost drowns it.
i am a huge fan of your method: the brute force method - aka originality and genuineness. i really admire people who are cunning and lucky enough to not fall into traps. may i have your autograph?
Hah!

Yeah I'm lucky, if luck is that I am almost unable to draw the same character twise! Nah, I think it is about what different people like. I like to challenge myself in a different way than the manga masters. And I used to be such a perfectionist. When I still painted with wacom and photoshop. That "undo" is really the worst enemy.