I question why the schools cost so much. Part of it is that there has been credential inflation. Jobs that used to require only a high school diploma and perhaps some work experience now require a college degree, even though that often is not needed to perform the duties. Inflated requirements fuel inflated demands, which keeps prices high. University education has become little more than job training in many cases, rather than the pursuit and development of true scholarship as it once was. Job training is fine, but let's use the right tool for the job and set up trade schools or apprentice programs for that, and let universities do what they do best.Why do so many people recoil at the idea that formal higher education should be something students receive a return on investment from? It seems kinda anti-student to me. If the schools cost so much, shouldn't they set them on a pathway so they can pay ift off? I'd be fine with the "place for learning" model if the cost wasn't so high.
I question why the schools cost so much. Part of it is that there has been credential inflation. Jobs that used to require only a high school diploma and perhaps some work experience now require a college degree, even though that often is not needed to perform the duties. Inflated requirements fuel inflated demands, which keeps prices high. University education has become little more than job training in many cases, rather than the pursuit and development of true scholarship as it once was. Job training is fine, but let's use the right tool for the job and set up trade schools or apprentice programs for that, and let universities do what they do best.
No surprise at all. And it's going to get worse - as in, climate targets will continue to be missed.Open secret at climate talks: The top temperature goal is mostly gone
As I said some 2 months ago: start thinking about what you will do when things actually get out of hand. Since it is becoming totally evident that this isn't getting fixed on time. I know these are heavy words but this is just how it looks like. After all this looks as pretty much another climate summit where nothing really will be fixed.
No surprise at all. And it's going to get worse - as in, climate targets will continue to be missed.
Focus needs to switch to carbon extraction technology. You can't make consumption unpopular and you can't make carbon taxes popular. It's a big waste of effort and investing in expensive and low energy density renewables is distracting from research into extraction technology. At the very least, focus on nuclear power and making it safe as possible until something better can be found.
The answer probably lies in changing the way our economies work. I don't know how anyone does that, whether it's here or in Europe.Therefore I think that we are coming to the point where we simply have to admit it to ourselves that we are in dead end street. Not a comforting thought but if you go deep enough that is the most logical conclusion.