• You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to additional post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), view blogs, respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so please join our community today! Just click here to register. You should turn your Ad Blocker off for this site or certain features may not work properly. If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us by clicking here.

Random Movie Thoughts Thread

Kingu Kurimuzon

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 27, 2013
Messages
20,938
MBTI Type
I
Enneagram
9w8
Instinctual Variant
sp/sx
I think I prefer Die Hard With A Vengeance as the best film in that series, by an edge. I also think Die Hard 2 is superb and kinda overlooked (not unlike Predator 2) and is on par with the first film. This series has a good slate of villains, so memorable compared to a lot of very forgettable villains from similar action movies.

Die Hard 4 also isn’t half bad but I’ll always prefer the original three. Won’t even mention the last movie
 

Totenkindly

@.~*virinaĉo*~.@
Joined
Apr 19, 2007
Messages
52,149
MBTI Type
BELF
Enneagram
594
Instinctual Variant
sx/sp
I think I prefer Die Hard With A Vengeance as the best film in that series, by an edge. I also think Die Hard 2 is superb and kinda overlooked (not unlike Predator 2) and is on par with the first film. This series has a good slate of villains, like so memorable, compared to a lot of very forgettable villains from similar action movies
I actually really like Die Hard 2 (even apart from the brief cameo of Robert Patrick as a background thug, lol). Almost rewatched it again this past Christmas, although then I ended up not watching any Die Hard films...

Not much of a Renny Harlin fan in general, but this film + Deep Blue Sea (which is getting a really great 4K package release in two months or so, finally) are pretty enjoyable.
 
Joined
Jul 24, 2008
Messages
22,429
MBTI Type
EVIL
Enneagram
5w6
Instinctual Variant
sp/so
I forget if I said this previously, but I think Mann (whose name is kind of on the nose) ties into comments made earlier by Brandt when she tells Cooper that evil doesn't really exist in nature -- it's something that human beings bring with them. He embodies the voice of reason without individual compassion, which can justify violations of specific individuals in the name of the "greater good."

I think he's a little frightening because he's not completely wrong (like why the elder Brandt doesn't fill the staff in that there is no plan A realistically, so as to encourage them to contribute to the cause, because they wouldn't be as invested on a purely philanthropic level). However, he was a chicken-shit coward (which I could forgive if he owned up to it and tried to make up for it) who then tries to off Cooper and maroon them on the same planet they just saved him from in the name of the greater good, rather than trying to win them over -- that kind of duplicity is the "evil" he embodies.

We kinda also had to have Mann, because the docking sequence is a highlight of the film. Like, damn.

Mackenzie Foy (young Murph) and Jessica Chastain (adult Murph) are just really great in their individual performances plus how those performances and their appearances mesh. It's really believable they're one character, and Chastain in particular SO well sells Murph's hope, desperation, and anger as an adult. She makes it look so easy. (Of course, Burstyn also just nails her small role out of the park.) But yeah, that first appearance of adult Murph is incredible and Chastain just embodies it -- leading to one of the coolest cuts in the film too when we step back with her into a present-moment scene rather than what we were viewing a past recording.

I really like how Cooper rips on Brandt about love being quantitative and her belief does sound a little flimsy in the moment -- but she ends up being correct for the crux of the film, that the specificity of Cooper's relationship with his daughter -- exact moments in time he is aware of personally -- is what enables him to connect with her across space and time. He's the only one who knows of those moments and knows how to reach her, and the watch he gave her out of love is something he knows she would never abandon and is the vehicle for all the information he provides her. Cooper ends up with egg on his face and ends up going to support Brandt in the end.

What I liked about Brandt's character was that it pointed the way towards our emotions sometimes being useful guides for understanding a situation, rather than something to be shunned and rejected. Or maybe it was more that she pointed towards the idea of how a subjective view can exist alongside an objective view, and that they can exist in harmony.
 
Last edited:

Totenkindly

@.~*virinaĉo*~.@
Joined
Apr 19, 2007
Messages
52,149
MBTI Type
BELF
Enneagram
594
Instinctual Variant
sx/sp
What I liked about Brandt's character was they it was the way she pointed towards our emotions sometimes being useful guides for understanding a situation, rather than something to be shunned and rejected. Or maybe it was more that she pointed towards the idea of how a subjective view can exist alongside an objective view, and that they can exist in harmony.
It's funny watching it how neither really much like each other at the beginning (Brand is rather contemptuous of him, Cooper is kind of aggressive), and so they kind of make an agreement of boundaries to keep the mission on track... and he's really pissed at her over what happens on Miller's planet.... but by the middle/end of the film, they have bonded and realized they are firmly on each other's side. it's kind of crushing to Brand over what happens at Gargantua ("We agreed, Amelia -- 90%" talk about ripping one's heart out), and the end of the film shows them as kindred spirit in a sense. If not for the two of them working together, the mission(s) would have failed.
 

SearchingforPeace

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 9, 2015
Messages
5,815
MBTI Type
ENFJ
Enneagram
9w8
Instinctual Variant
sx/so
I actually really like Die Hard 2 (even apart from the brief cameo of Robert Patrick as a background thug, lol). Almost rewatched it again this past Christmas, although then I ended up not watching any Die Hard films...

Not much of a Renny Harlin fan in general, but this film + Deep Blue Sea (which is getting a really great 4K package release in two months or so, finally) are pretty enjoyable.
Deep Blue Sea was very solid action. I enjoyed it when I watched it again recently. Die Hard 2 was really fun. Harlin has made a bunch of fun films.
 

Totenkindly

@.~*virinaĉo*~.@
Joined
Apr 19, 2007
Messages
52,149
MBTI Type
BELF
Enneagram
594
Instinctual Variant
sx/sp
Deep Blue Sea was very solid action. I enjoyed it when I watched it again recently. Die Hard 2 was really fun. Harlin has made a bunch of fun films.
DBS was definitely a film that understood what it was and leaned hard into it (with all the melodrama and craziness), so it could be enjoyed for exactly what it was, melodrama and all.

It was also one of those times when audience feedback make a positive difference, in terms of which characters survived and which did not. Originally one of the survivors was marked for death and one who died had been chosen to survive, but the audience hated that apparently in test screenings. I like the way it ended up, I felt like the arcs gave more depth to the characters involved -- which is nice in a film that is mostly entertaining melodrama, it elevates the film a bit.
 

Totenkindly

@.~*virinaĉo*~.@
Joined
Apr 19, 2007
Messages
52,149
MBTI Type
BELF
Enneagram
594
Instinctual Variant
sx/sp
I didnt need all the wedding details but maybe that's part of an ongoing feature by NYT... I just thought the story was nice. Always liked this film, it was tragic when the drummer was hit while bicycling in recent years.


1000011611.jpg
 

Totenkindly

@.~*virinaĉo*~.@
Joined
Apr 19, 2007
Messages
52,149
MBTI Type
BELF
Enneagram
594
Instinctual Variant
sx/sp
I Saw the TV Glow -- had the A24 blu-ray on my shelf for awhile, finally said today was the day to watch it.

I felt like Schoenbrun's first film ("we're all going to the world's fair") was inventive but kind of fell apart into chaos. I didn't really feel that way with this film, it held me for the full run despite being yet another film describing more emotional and psychological state.

The direction is so confident in this film, and the lighting and framing so purposeful. Even in the most mundane of scenes, the images are still enticing and interesting. The visual and audial elements all work together so well.

This isn't a film I can describe well, because I more "felt" this film on a visceral level. I am not a Millennial, I'm Gen X and grew up under a different set of cultural influences (so shows like Buffy or Goosebumps were not part of my formative years), but as I think about this film, I almost want to cry. I think Schoenbrun captures well the dichotomy between familiarity/safeness and also feeling like the entire world is wrong in that you are not actually who you seem to be, and even the difficulty in sorting through it all and trying to figure out what to do about it. It's hard watching Owen struggle so much with this throughout the film, buttressed by the mantra "There's still time." God. There's such a tendency to sit and be the dutiful child, the dutiful parent, the dutiful productive member of society by everyone else's view even if inside you feel like you are in a slow bleed and will eventually bleed out -- while on one level you're so tired and confused that you are okay with that, while on another level you just want to drop to your knees and scream and scream and scream.

Both the leads have a pervasive haunted look in their eyes.

I'll ask my non-binary kid if they ever saw this film. They haven't mentioned it yet, but they are closer to the timeframe and cultural mindset than I am for it, and I still found it pretty powerful.

Really superb acting by Justice Smith and Bridgette Lundy-Paine, and also I love the musical influences on this film, how some of the story is told through music (because you really need to "feel" your way through this film), and how it all seems to integrate seamlessly.

I feel like this film is much better at describing incongruent experiences than many of the more explicit films, which sometimes drift into the realm of pandering and end up as a battle of ideas. I think generating an experience that intersects viewers via a deep-seated emotional connectivity is a more effective means of generating understanding.
 
Last edited:

Totenkindly

@.~*virinaĉo*~.@
Joined
Apr 19, 2007
Messages
52,149
MBTI Type
BELF
Enneagram
594
Instinctual Variant
sx/sp

I agree in the sense it's a solid film but probably the least of Nolan's full length features.

Actually I take that back, I hate a lot of the incoherence of TDKR.... and Insomnia rarely feels scatterbrained or chintzy like TDKR can.

My least favorite parr of Insomnia is Tierney's on the nose delivery in her revelations of her past -- clunky writing, clumsy delivery, too convenient -- and Swank's role is also a little unsubtle at times.

Pacino and Donovan elevate this film, and Williams has a nice turn.
 

Totenkindly

@.~*virinaĉo*~.@
Joined
Apr 19, 2007
Messages
52,149
MBTI Type
BELF
Enneagram
594
Instinctual Variant
sx/sp
I commemorated inauguration day by watching Grave of the Fireflies (1988) by Studio Ghibli.

I've tried to watch other Ghibli films but usually fail to feel anything while watching. This film was far more accessible to me and I felt a great deal. I think the animation was also just superb in capturing little human reactions to things that feel so authentic (like when Setsuko pricks her thumb with a needle, the little pinprick swells into a blood drop, and then the way she sucks on it to make it feel better -- but there's a lot of other small things that feel so typical a human response). Obviously i watched the subtitled version, the voice acting was just so great even for Setsuko (since she is only 4 in the film).

Obviously I come from a different cultural background so I probably don't scan the film in ways that the Japanese do (esp for the people who had lived through that time, although they'd be in their mid 80's and older now). The aunt made me extremely angry and I get why Seita left. I also get why he didn't go back, even if in some ways it was foolhardy and not quite connected with reality. On one hand, that situation of living on their own without support became untenable; but dealing with the aunt was also horrific from an emotional standpoint. I don't know what other options they had, it didn't seem like the rest of society had a lot of support network in place to help them.

Sometimes war kills people directly. Sometimes it kills them slowly, so they're aware of every moment of it.

I like that Seito and Setsuko are together at the end of things again. Obviously it wasn't going to go differently but they still have each other. It was just pretty touching and got me on the Cry-meter.
 

Totenkindly

@.~*virinaĉo*~.@
Joined
Apr 19, 2007
Messages
52,149
MBTI Type
BELF
Enneagram
594
Instinctual Variant
sx/sp

The Cat

The Cat in the Tinfoil Hat..
Staff member
Joined
Oct 15, 2016
Messages
27,393
I sometimes wonder if Peter Weller and Kurtwood Smith ever have a beer together and talk about their youth when they spent all those months pretending to kill each other. I would think that would be one of the more enjoyable parts about being an actor.
 

Totenkindly

@.~*virinaĉo*~.@
Joined
Apr 19, 2007
Messages
52,149
MBTI Type
BELF
Enneagram
594
Instinctual Variant
sx/sp
Got the Se7en 4K this week, finally. Visually it looks great -- especially the external landscape shots in the final portion of the film. The color and clarity is just amazing.

But I don't know if this film ages well. It just feels a bit derivative. The score by Howard Score just reminds me of the better "The Silence of the Lambs." Somerset reminds me of the Tommy Lee Jones cop (Bell) in the much better later "No Country for Old Men." The chase sequence reminds me a lot now of the "Insomnia" sequence by Nolan, with Williams fleeing Dormer, with this latter version more interesting dramatically.

Mills is just freaking annoying, he's so dumb and emotion-based. It's hard for me to believe he got his way up the ladder to a Detective position, while being so non-smart and reactive. Spacey's performance feels kind of on the nose, as does a lot of the script -- which considering the writer's track record, well, that's understandable. In addition, killing people because of the seven deadly sins isn't a new concept and wasn't at the time either, as far as crime stories go.

I feel like this film was such a hit mainly because of the look and feel, and at the time it stood out, and it has a few shocking moments (especially during the Sloth sequence). The props (like the notebooks) and the set dressings are pretty nifty. I'm trying not to be too hard on it, because it was also Fincher's first "real" film (since Alien3 production was such a terrible mess), it was both a distinctive calling card for him + a learning experience, where you can really see him doing his thing on his next films like "The Game" and "Fight Club" and onwards. So in that sense it is a very important film, because of what it gave cinema later.

There was a big stink over the packaging for the 4K being apparently drastically changed. I agree, it's utter shite -- it unfolds from the middle but includes no real content but the one disc and scenes from the film to dress it up + the packaging was stick so I had to actually break the glue and kind of ruin the disc slot to get the disc out. The Blu-ray book package coming out at least ten years prior was far better, with actual gloss pages with photos of the interior of the notebooks, etc.
 

The Cat

The Cat in the Tinfoil Hat..
Staff member
Joined
Oct 15, 2016
Messages
27,393
Got the Se7en 4K this week, finally. Visually it looks great -- especially the external landscape shots in the final portion of the film. The color and clarity is just amazing.

But I don't know if this film ages well. It just feels a bit derivative. The score by Howard Score just reminds me of the better "The Silence of the Lambs." Somerset reminds me of the Tommy Lee Jones cop (Bell) in the much better later "No Country for Old Men." The chase sequence reminds me a lot now of the "Insomnia" sequence by Nolan, with Williams fleeing Dormer, with this latter version more interesting dramatically.

Mills is just freaking annoying, he's so dumb and emotion-based. It's hard for me to believe he got his way up the ladder to a Detective position, while being so non-smart and reactive. Spacey's performance feels kind of on the nose, as does a lot of the script -- which considering the writer's track record, well, that's understandable. In addition, killing people because of the seven deadly sins isn't a new concept and wasn't at the time either, as far as crime stories go.

I feel like this film was such a hit mainly because of the look and feel, and at the time it stood out, and it has a few shocking moments (especially during the Sloth sequence). The props (like the notebooks) and the set dressings are pretty nifty. I'm trying not to be too hard on it, because it was also Fincher's first "real" film (since Alien3 production was such a terrible mess), it was both a distinctive calling card for him + a learning experience, where you can really see him doing his thing on his next films like "The Game" and "Fight Club" and onwards. So in that sense it is a very important film, because of what it gave cinema later.

There was a big stink over the packaging for the 4K being apparently drastically changed. I agree, it's utter shite -- it unfolds from the middle but includes no real content but the one disc and scenes from the film to dress it up + the packaging was stick so I had to actually break the glue and kind of ruin the disc slot to get the disc out. The Blu-ray book package coming out at least ten years prior was far better, with actual gloss pages with photos of the interior of the notebooks, etc.
Se7en worked so well at the time because at the time it was one of the scariest things someone could think of at the time, now so much of it feels...just like Tuesday...any given Tuesday...anywhere in the world now.

If they made Se7en today it would either be an analogue horror or a found footage "documentary" type piece to pack the same punch as it did in its time. But that's just my 2 cents.
 

Totenkindly

@.~*virinaĉo*~.@
Joined
Apr 19, 2007
Messages
52,149
MBTI Type
BELF
Enneagram
594
Instinctual Variant
sx/sp
Watched Emilia Perez today. I would give it a 3.5/5 rating. Not a bad film, but it also seems to remain frustratingly superficial (in the sense of "on the surface") with only occasional glimpses of deeper revelation.

The music is fine. If someone hates music as part of their films (which means they probably hate Hamilton and dislike La-La Land and some Disney pics), then sure I get the malcontent. It's not music in the sense of Joker 2 either (which was basically a story with occasional new covers of old 40-50's songs, it's more in the sense of a musical -- but at least it is done consistently and becomes part of the movie's tapestry.

EP is a bit annoying in its obsession early about surgical procedures and also in making the clinic look wide, spacious, and wealthy. I don't know what the foreign centers are like nowadays, but 15 years ago the best doctors in the world (of which there was a handful of ten), while perhaps treating a lot of people overall, had pretty much "hole in wall" clinics. The exteriors were kind of shoved in among poorer settings, and the interiors were small, not spacious, and very efficient, with few extra rooms or staff.

I personally found Emilia's boy presentation a bit haunting in that I recognized the male persona with female body positioning -- how the hands and arms are held and positioned even when sitting, how the body is trying to pull in on itself to not look so large, etc. Maybe cis people would not recognize it but it all leapt out to me as the small signals and things one does to alleviate even a bit the discomfort of gender incongruity.

The film does have this awkward balance between glamorizing Emilia and judging her. It also makes gender transition look easy - which in some ways it is if you have a ton of money. (Take another look at Caitlyn Jenner, whose money afforded her the ability to not really integrate well as a woman otherwise because she thought her appearance -- which money can really help with -- was enough.) Mostly it avoids saying much at all, but at times there are flashes of conflict between the horrible things Emilia did as as drug lord and her persona after transition. We assume she feels some guilt over the things she did or felt compelled to do to survive, by her funding the operation to recover the bodies of cartel victims so their families get closure, but again she is still very rich from her drug profits and still living the wealthy lifestyle. Is there a sacrifice truly being made by her as recompense, aside from time and effort?

One of the true dilemmas is wanting to move on to a new life but being emotionally intertwined with your old. pretending to be her sons' aunt is eventually no longer good enough when Emilia's former wife (who does not yet know she has been living in her husband's, not husband's sister's, house) wants to move on with a new family and take the children along. So we do get a jarring scene of Emilia forgetting herself and lashing out physically and emotionally because they are "her kids" and she is losing them again in a way. But this is the dilemma most transitioners experience. Emilia is privileged by her money to have been able to have her kids back to some degree for additional time. Emilia set this in motion by privatizing her gender transition and abandoning her male identity entirely rather than being willing to be out to her ex-wife and kids. So this is what happens. But it does draw a point of continuity between the old male version of Emilia and her current incarnation -- that anger over having her children taken away resorts in some physical and emotional responses that are reflective of the person she also used to be.

Eventually this ends up badly for everyone involved. So I found the film's ending rather unsatisfying. What was this film trying to say? Nothing really got resolved. Nothing was really realized per se, because we never got to see any kind of resolution between Emilia and the ex and the children. The film ends with kind of a homage to her public persona that just feels empty and not really addressing the totality of Emilia.

Gascon does a great job at playing a man at the beginning of the film, and of course is entirely fine as Emilia. Best Actress of the year? I'm kind of indifferent. Saldana might actually do more heavy lifting in this film. It's a reminder of much fire Saldana typically brings to her roles, whether they are serious dramatic roles, action films, or comedy.
 

Totenkindly

@.~*virinaĉo*~.@
Joined
Apr 19, 2007
Messages
52,149
MBTI Type
BELF
Enneagram
594
Instinctual Variant
sx/sp
Saturday Night -- I forgot this even came out in wide release.

Perhaps the highlight of this effort is the cast channeling the various SNL celebrities and some other known figures, since a lot of it is spot-on. Like, it's freakin' uncanny at some points. Dylan o' Brien as Dan Akroyd and Nicholas Podany as Billy Crystal were exceptionally good, and Cory Michael Smith really captured the asshole prima donna facet of Chevy Chase.

This film also makes Johnny Carson and Milton Berle look like dicks. (And I guess "dick" has extra meaning for Berle, as per these scenes.)

But the overall point of the film, and making Lorne Michaels the centerpiece? Gabriel LaBelle seemingly does a fine job, although I have nothing to compare too, and he manages to evoke a lot of the deep wells of patience and hope needed to get the opening show on the air, and... what exactly?

I'm not sure what I was supposed to be looking for in this film. A few sketch bits rang true, but again, I felt like I was watching more of a homage and/or a "Hey, look at how good we can channel the original cast" film vs something novel and interesting in itself.
 
Top