The question is what specific fields are you interested in and how much time do you spend thinking, or learning about science, math or technology? How do you spend this time? Do you read scientific journals, or popular science magazines or books? Excessive perusal of Wikipedia? Do you practise your own experiments, or at least devise potential experiments of your own that you would carry out were you a professional scientist?
I like less-Te-oriented aspects of science (where detail and drawing clear conclusions and following careful process is specifically important) and more the Ti-oriented aspects of science, more in the realm of pure logic or drawing general/board conclusions and ending up with a conceptual system of some sort. Gray also does not bother me; I *enjoy* open-ended exploration, and drawing conclusions that can still accurately encompass vague data (saying what can but only what can be said about the data in question).
So what I like to read usually involves less numbers and more concepts... less calculations and more just determining what equations should exist in the first place. The boundaries and tautologies describing what actually is.
I'll read books, magazines, Wikipedia, online articles. I'll watch Discover and TLC channels, interviews/clips on YouTube, actual documentaries and shows. I like psychology and human behavior/development the best as a topic, but I'm into archeology, sociology, criminology, psychology, culture, religions, psychology, astronomy, taxonomy, dinosaurs, architecture, biology, physics, art history... I shouldn't limit it, because pretty much any topic can capture my attention if I run across it in the right context, and I'll drop what I'm doing to read/watch what I've found.
I don't really do "experiments" at this point in my life, I typically just read about other people's experiments/data or work with concepts and direct observation.
As far as my educated fields of study, I spent two years in college as a math major, became a technical writer, and now work as a systems analyst. I like analysis more than development/coding because I'm focused again on rules, processes, flows, big-picture understanding and definition of the boundaries/constraints on a coherent system. I always did well in math calculation, but it's kind of boring to me, and I hate fields like accounting.