New Version of Forum Personality Test

[Betty Blue]

Personality Results – Typology Central Jung Personality Test

I got a higher result of Ni than Ne, but Fi is very clear.

Edit: Also some of the questions were really hard to answer and i think i might answer them differently on different days... maybe i should let you know which ones [MENTION=8936]highlander[/MENTION]

 

[SigmaEnigma]

Edit: Also some of the questions were really hard to answer and i think i might answer them differently on different days... maybe i should let you know which ones [MENTION=8936]highlander[/MENTION]

Same here, a select few of them were either none or strong on 2 or 3 options.

 

[/DG/]

ISFJ

Si > Fi > Te = Fe = Se > Ne > Ni > Ti

Edit: Results were not particularly strong:
Personality Results – Typology Central Jung Personality Test

I have an incredibly hard time finding generalities to my personality that match answers to cognitive function tests. Many of these, I did not have much of an opinion on.

 

[highlander]

Personality Results – Typology Central Jung Personality Test

I got a higher result of Ni than Ne, but Fi is very clear.

Edit: Also some of the questions were really hard to answer and i think i might answer them differently on different days... maybe i should let you know which ones [MENTION=8936]highlander[/MENTION]

I guess this is a good example of where the logic is working even though the function ordering isn't exactly matching.

 

[highlander]

ISFJ

Si > Fi > Te = Fe = Se > Ne > Ni > Ti

Edit: Results were not particularly strong:
Personality Results – Typology Central Jung Personality Test

I have an incredibly hard time finding generalities to my personality that match answers to cognitive function tests. Many of these, I did not have much of an opinion on.

Interesting results. Do you think ISFJ is correct?

 

[highlander]

Of course, this is your test, hence your decision to do what you wish with it. That said, the MBTI foundation (actual Myers-Briggs) and Jung are the theories that MBTI/dichotomies are premised on.

If you seriously want to change things around, create an ambivert classification since the majority of the population are ambiverts.

I'm not just looking to change the system - just design a reasonably accurate testing instrument.

 

[/DG/]

Interesting results. Do you think ISFJ is correct?

Couldn't tell you. The most common results I get on these things are ISJ types, though.

I will say that I outwardly display as more of a thinker than a feeler. But internally, I may actually be more of a feeler.

 

[Verona]

It worked this time

Personality Results – Typology Central Jung Personality Test

 

[kyuuei]

It won't let my C&P

but I got ENFP so seems a-ok to me!

 

[rav3n]

Hiya, this test didn't work? I tried it twice and the results page comes up blank

As an FYI, it appears that the test didn't work twice for this new member.

 

[Lord Lavender]

INTJ

Ne/Te/Ni/Fi/Fe/Si/Ti/Se

 

[danthemanklein]

Finished this test about two weeks, and got these results:

Fi > Si > Ne > Fe > Ni > Ti > Te = Se (INFP)

EDIT: Took it again, and pretty much got the same exact results, except this time, it’s different:

Fi > Si > Ne > Fe = Ni > Ti > Se > Te (ISFP)

Confusing cause it’s pretty much in the same order as last time, and Si and Ne are way higher than Ni and Se. Yet, it still gave me a different result.

 

[Lady Elizabeth]

I got ISFP. Well done, Quiz

 

[SurrealisticSlumbers]

It thinks I'm an INTJ. Okey dokey, artichokey.

Some of those "Most Like Me/Least Like Me" questions were downright maddening. I recall more than one question where it seemed that every single one of the responses resonated with me and who I am, and yet I was forced by the test to select one as being least like me. I also had a pretty difficult time with choosing a response that was "most like me" when multiple responses felt equally accurate... It was like playing eeny, meeny, miny, moe...ya know? I am more a fan of Enneatypes than MBTI, personally.

 

[Andy]

This is a new version of the forum's personality test. I'm looking to test the test. Let me know if you think the results are accurate

Typology Central Jung Personality Test

There's a typo in the last question, second option - it doesn't appear to be a complete sentence.

THat said, it predicted me as an INTJ.

 

[rav3n]

I'm not just looking to change the system - just design a reasonably accurate testing instrument.

But if you don't premise the test on Myers-Briggs official definitions, what exactly are you testing for with the E/I dichotomy? Would this really be an MBTI test or should it be called a [insert whatever theory you're applying] test?

 

[highlander]

There's a typo in the last question, second option - it doesn't appear to be a complete sentence.

THat said, it predicted me as an INTJ.

This question? What's wrong with it?

"I attempt to discern patterns of behaviors and motivations that others seem have"

 

[highlander]

But if you don't premise the test on Myers-Briggs official definitions, what exactly are you testing for with the E/I dichotomy? Would this really be an MBTI test or should it be called a [insert whatever theory you're applying] test?

It's not an MBTI test. It's simply four letter type - combination of cognitive functions and dichotomies. Again, all that matters to me is that it works.

 

[highlander]

This question? What's wrong with it?

"I attempt to discern patterns of behaviors and motivations that others seem have"

Haha. I see it now

 

[rav3n]

It's not an MBTI test. It's simply four letter type - combination of cognitive functions and dichotomies. Again, all that matters to me is that it works.

Went back to the opening page of the test and you're applying Kiersey's definition of E/I which focuses on gregariousness assessment through behaviours (social behaviour), rather than the official MBTI definition of E/I, that of orientation to the world.