Jeremy8419
Permabanned
- Joined
- May 6, 2016
- Messages
- 771
- MBTI Type
- INFJ
- Enneagram
- 925
- Instinctual Variant
- so/sx
Thanks for the info. I can try.
I don't see why this would be the case. Socionics is just a tool to identify how a person's brain is hardwired, and to try to predict how a inter-relation between two types is going to play out. Perhaps sexual orientation (not physical gender) would affect how far these people involved would get in the relationship, but the inter-type relation would stay the same. The way your brain is hardwired is independent from your sexual orientation (I think), and also independent from physical gender. There seems to be higher chance that if you are physically a male, you'll get a "male brain" too, but then we have transgendered people.
By using the same logical rules that it is built upon. If you're going to divide up and categorize reality dichotomously, then you cannot simply choose to ignore the dichotomy of male/female without the whole thing being illogical. Similarly, if you take the dichotomy of subjective/objective (they already did this), then the two dichotomies combined would lead to 4 possible combinations which fit into Socionics logical structure: male-subjective, male-objective, female-subjective, and female-objective. Taking your consideration at the moment into account, you are questioning both yourself and I about if male/female is something subjective or objective. By taking that, we can say that those who do not consider male/female to be real to be subjective, which places all who do not consider male/female to be real as Alpha or Beta. This also bears the consequence of the subjective types and the objective types to place other individuals as contrary types in whatever manner they do choose to divide male/female into their own understandings of Socionics.