• You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to additional post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), view blogs, respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so please join our community today! Just click here to register. You should turn your Ad Blocker off for this site or certain features may not work properly. If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us by clicking here.

Moral imperative for a housing crash... and permanent devaluation

ygolo

My termites win
Joined
Aug 6, 2007
Messages
6,730

It would take a certain type of resident. But, I like the mixed use trend.
 

The Cat

The Cat in the Tinfoil Hat..
Staff member
Joined
Oct 15, 2016
Messages
27,393
When I was a kid hanging out in the mall I used to think. One day these will be places people live like little post apocalyptic palace towns.
 
Joined
Jul 24, 2008
Messages
22,429
MBTI Type
EVIL
Enneagram
5w6
Instinctual Variant
sp/so
When I was a kid hanging out in the mall I used to think. One day these will be places people live like little post apocalyptic palace towns.
I actually thought as a kid that malls would be around forever. I admit I mourn their passing. They used to seem futuristic to me, even before I saw Timecop.
 
Last edited:

Lark

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 21, 2009
Messages
29,682
I'm not sure a permanent devaluation will ever happen in housing, it seems like one of those types of markets in which there is a definitely finite supply and as a result there will always be sufficient scarcity to drive up demand and consequently price most people out in the longer term, monopoly only ever gets played one way, international competition/globalization I think only ever posed a temporary break on that tendency (in other markets too).

I do think there's a moral and economic case for the taxation of supernormal profits and especially where rent seeking is very definitely a market failing on transfers and transactions.

This is part of the tendency to exclude all but a precious few from the status of ownership. Marx analysed it a long time ago and I cant say he was wrong about, it also was not much of a fresh insight, even then, and had been detected by a lot of earlier economists.

Unfortunately, because it was Marx, and because of the associations with socialism or communism, anathemas to the American mind, it cant be admitted into US consciousness, unless its qualified by anti-semitism or sectarianism or racism.

It can be admitted if it validates WASPs persecution complexes, not if its a basic rule of the economy because WASPs are meant to love the economy and resist any interference with it at all costs.
 

ygolo

My termites win
Joined
Aug 6, 2007
Messages
6,730
When I was a kid hanging out in the mall I used to think. One day these will be places people live like little post apocalyptic palace towns.
I would think of them as quarters in a space station. My wife would not approve. :)
 

ygolo

My termites win
Joined
Aug 6, 2007
Messages
6,730
I'm not sure a permanent devaluation will ever happen in housing, it seems like one of those types of markets in which there is a definitely finite supply and as a result there will always be sufficient scarcity to drive up demand and consequently price most people out in the longer term, monopoly only ever gets played one way, international competition/globalization I think only ever posed a temporary break on that tendency (in other markets too).

I do think there's a moral and economic case for the taxation of supernormal profits and especially where rent seeking is very definitely a market failing on transfers and transactions.

This is part of the tendency to exclude all but a precious few from the status of ownership. Marx analysed it a long time ago and I cant say he was wrong about, it also was not much of a fresh insight, even then, and had been detected by a lot of earlier economists.

Unfortunately, because it was Marx, and because of the associations with socialism or communism, anathemas to the American mind, it cant be admitted into US consciousness, unless its qualified by anti-semitism or sectarianism or racism.

It can be admitted if it validates WASPs persecution complexes, not if its a basic rule of the economy because WASPs are meant to love the economy and resist any interference with it at all costs.
Can you expand a bit on what you mean?
 

Lark

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 21, 2009
Messages
29,682
Can you expand a bit on what you mean?

There's a tendency towards monopoly and concentration of wealth, no matter how many ways the pack is shuffled or reset, it will inevitably play out that way again.

The later part of my post was just about how there are populations of people who will accept ideas if they are framed in racist ways, or as conspiracy theories, usually something anti-semitic, which they wont accept otherwise, for instance as mundane economic analysis.
 

ygolo

My termites win
Joined
Aug 6, 2007
Messages
6,730

I'm going to say no. Prefab houses have been around for a long.

Without the grid of plumbing, electricity, and transportation to plug into, the costs aren't leveled.

Also, zoning and NIMBYism are the biggest problems.

Edit, history repeats quickly now:
 

SensEye

Active member
Joined
May 10, 2007
Messages
876
MBTI Type
INTp
I'm not sure about 'factory built' although if it reduces construction costs (and theoretically rent) on newly built units it should be considered. I think much more high density housing is the inevitable answer. People don't particularly like that notion, but detached single family homes in sprawling suburbs that require all sorts of infrastructure (roads, sewers, etc. etc.) are not going to come cheap.
 

ygolo

My termites win
Joined
Aug 6, 2007
Messages
6,730
I'm not sure about 'factory built' although if it reduces construction costs (and theoretically rent) on newly built units it should be considered. I think much more high density housing is the inevitable answer. People don't particularly like that notion, but detached single family homes in sprawling suburbs that require all sorts of infrastructure (roads, sewers, etc. etc.) are not going to come cheap.
It would be part of the solution, but we've had that part for a long time.

Perhaps this could be another part:
 
Top