I enjoy leadership, naturally. But I agree with Metamorphosis, only if i'm the best suited for the job. Which pretty much is whenever something needs to be done quickly. I know for a fact that people dislike when I get brutally honest and effective, so I keep those parts reigned in tightly most of the time and operate more with suggestions and actually trying to listen to other people. Most of the time people just can't say anything intelligent and original... But I still nod and look like I care, then I completely ignore their input and find some way of saying that their idea sucks without hurting their precious feelings.
The context in my case is usually group studies, with five other people. Two of them are quitters. They are always gone, so I can hardly type them; and when they're actually attending seminars and our study sessions, they are so
terribly stupid and introverted in combination that I can't get a read on their types. I get ISxx from one and INxx from the other.
Me, ENTJ.
ENFP man, 25. Christian guy. Computer nerd. Cool to have discussions with regarding religion.
INTP girl/woman something. 20. From Colombia. Pretty cool. Adores me for some reason. Makes good points every now and then, when she decides to share
ENTP guy, 32. We generally agree upon everything. We play chess during lectures on our laptops. Has original ideas, and combined with my original thoughts, it's fucking great. Best symbiosis
EVARR.
INxx - stupid. The lights are on but no-one's home.
ISxx - retarded conservative idiot. Good thing she's never there.
What's great about this group is that the command structure is sublime, but it is pretty clear. There's no bullshit and everyone contributes to our work. I'm usually pulling about 40% of the load, though. But I wouldn't have it any other way; I write pretty good in swedish, and I have a lot to say regarding pedagogy, law and leadership.