In your mind, anything is possible![]()
agreed. though, i have no proof of such a thing. i just think the theory makes more sense in a developing sense if people are static in XXXX, yet develope weaker functions as they go. changing "dominant functions" to me just doesnt make sense (this is coming from someone who at first thought they were INFP).
babe, is your te blown away yet?![]()
is that aasking for more Te? I like reward systems...though im generally the one doing the giving and taking
![]()
*feels the walls of her world closing in tighter and tighter* o0o0h yea TEACH ME HOW IT'S DONE, I LIKE INCENTIVES!CAKE
sing Master of Puppets like its you're theme song...for me...then bring me
100 ISFJ minions to administer my plan without question.
1000 ISTP henchmen (all gorgeous females of course!).
10 ISTJs to run numbers, do my taxes, laundry and all of that stuff.
10 ENFP court jesters to keep me entertianed after world domination
1 INFJ "see-er" to warn me before i totally loose it, and to comfort me when i beat myself up.
5 ISFPs to form a cover band for my entertianment
1 INFP to sit around and do nothing
10 ENTPs to run the RnD dept.
---oh u want to learn how to do MY POSITION? dont be ridiculous. Master is in the singular form! mwahhahahaa
Curiously, INTP isn't on that list. HMM.....
Maybe it's because we're too smart to be controlled.
More likely though, we're some of the easiest. Just give us food and resources for our research and experiments, and we're pretty complacent. Just don't expect us to do any physical labor.
who would u rather design your weapons systems? Tony Stark...or Einstein?
they both worked: one works more flashy than it needs to be...the other worked a little "too" well haha.
Einstein didn't develop any weapons systems! Weapons systems were developed based on his ideas though...
And I choose Tony Stark, because he is equipped with super reality-defying comic intellect and resources of doom.
...exactly. ENTP FTW
people dont change types
people dont change types
agreed. though, i have no proof of such a thing. i just think the theory makes more sense in a developing sense if people are static in XXXX, yet develope weaker functions as they go. changing "dominant functions" to me just doesnt make sense (this is coming from someone who at first thought they were INFP).
Once you heard this you thought it was too cute to put up for adoption. This is a demon in a poor old child's body.