• You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to additional post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), view blogs, respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so please join our community today! Just click here to register. You should turn your Ad Blocker off for this site or certain features may not work properly. If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us by clicking here.

Interaction styles?

HongDou

navigating
Joined
Nov 23, 2012
Messages
5,191
MBTI Type
ENFP
Enneagram
6w7
Instinctual Variant
so/sx
Though some of these differences don't make sense to me. Why would ENFJ be in charge, when ESFJ isn't?

While the "Js are directive except for SFJs and Ps are responsive except for STPs" rule makes sense, I think it's interesting that it's the types with a Ti/Fe ego are the ones that go in different directions. FJs and TPs are either directive or responsive and it depends on whether Ni/Se or Ne/Si is leading or backing them up respectively - NFJ vs SFJ and STP vs NTP. OTOH Te/Fi types are consistent regardless of their perceiving function...all TJs are categorized as directive while FPs are all responsive. I've talked about this once before and recently [MENTION=23915]Sinclair[/MENTION] brought it back up which is why it's fresh in my mind again, but I find when engaging people on this forum most who are NJs or SPs tend to have some kind of "edge" to them that I don't see in SJs or NPs, who vibe to me as more lighter. Not that NJs/SPs are more abrasive than SJs/NPs, but I see more a heaviness in the former that's hard for me to put into words.
[MENTION=6561]OrangeAppled[/MENTION] do you have any ideas on what this might be?
 
Top