Southern Kross
Away with the fairies
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2008
- Messages
- 2,910
- MBTI Type
- INFP
- Enneagram
- 4w5
- Instinctual Variant
- so/sp
Actually I think it could be the other way round. INFPs tend to have a world view nutted out ahead of time. They develop broad universal philosophical theories, and then draw connections from particular circumstances to these big picture values. We are deeply and inherently in tune with the larger implications and consequence of a seemingly small and insignificant issue. This means that when something confronts an specific value it triggers not only a sense of violation of that value but the violation of the foundations of the INFP's whole belief system. And because we make that connection quickly and feel it passionately, I suppose this generally inspires a faster, more intense reaction than ISFPs. INFPs probably do spend more time thinking about things and preparing for them in theoretical terms, but in the moment this can provide a sort of short hand by connecting to these over-arching, predetermined concepts.The INFP, using Ne, obviously spends more time analyzing before taking action. They may also listen & observe longer, which allows them to grasp the other person's psychology, which obviously helps with "strategy" in conflict.
I'd say that the INFP may have a more well-though out, harder to argue with approach when they finally do take action. I tend to argue with myself internally, patch all the weak spots, and then approach the conflict with a "if they say this, then move here" mental chart.
ISFPs seem to approach a value violation more directly on a case-by-case basis. They spend time on each individual situation, weighing up the arguments, and consulting their own feelings to make a decision on how to act. This can be more time consuming because, without the guidance of Ne, they can get lost in the conflicting feelings (however it can also be a positive thing as they are more circumspect and less likely to make rash judgments). This would fit with my own experience, as I always seem to be much more decisive than my tentative ISFP friends. Although, I suppose ISFPs could potentially respond more quickly if they go with the first inclination that pops into their head without considering the other issues - perhaps if that feeling is strong enough it takes over.
I know not everyone likes fictional examples, but Luke Skywalker is often mentioned as an INFP archetype. There's a reason for that. And it's not because he's a do gooder per se. Or that he's a hero. There are many types like that. The difference with Skywalker is he stretches the limit on who or what can be redeemable, and sees good in Darth Vader.
Luke Skywalker seemed more ISFP to me too. Although, I am aware he is commonly typed INFP and that the story fits with a INFP archetype, as the redeemer in a corrupt system. But then I'm no Star Wars aficionado ...Who are you asking? Luke Skywalker showed no signs of iNtuition. His concerns were primarily with the immediate moment, his manner of speech was mostly abrupt. His motives were the Fi's notion of love, particularly, love and concern for the welfare of others, even Vader his father in the final scene.