I get you dislike the man so it could make sense that you don't want him associated anywhere near your type. 
I wonder [MENTION=12103]Poki[/MENTION], is your rejection of Trump as an STP type personal for you?
If that's the issue I get it. I gag a little every time I think of Barack Obama as an ENTP. I was on the fence about Obama being an ENFJ or ENTP but if I'm objective about it I think he falls closest to the ENTP side of things.
Contrast that to an actual ESTJ like Hillary who doesn't do very well when not going by convention. When she shoots from the hip it's usually a train wreck. When she does it seems to everyone awkward and forced and completely disingenuous. It's because it's unnatural improv for her. When Trump does it, yeah it's very controversial and it really polarizes people but he owns it. People expect that shooting from the hip and missing the mark at times is just a natural part of Trump's personality. If he suddenly became a well structured planner and way more filtered with a Te wall then everyone would be like WTF?
That or you give me the impression that you're very strong with your Ni-usage which I suppose is within the realm of possibility for an ISTP. 
How long have you been involved in the MBTI community? Do you really think judging means judgmental? So does this mean you don't think perceiving types talk in a "judgmental" manner? I really think you're letting your personal bias taint your objective evaluation here.
Did you really just insult ESTJs here as being shallow? xSTJs like to be prepared and feel the most 'in their element' when a well structured plan is in place kind of like a thoroughly written and thought out script to a movie instead of improv which is more of the 'P-ish' realm and very 'Trumpesque.'
These sound like made up stereotypes tbh.
You haven't provided good reasoning behind your point yet.
Your first mistake in this whole post is conflating judging with judgmental
Why are you adding such a personal touch to your evaluation of the types? You're constantly referencing people you know instead of ideas or abstract reasoning. Your distinguishing factor seems to be emotive characteristics like 'bigot' and 'smooth.' Is a Ti-dom really using 'vibes' to illustrate an abstract point with me? Furthermore, you defer to almost mystic or 'hidden' variables like 'differences under the skin' which explain nothing.
Maybe your Ni and Ti could be swapped?
Hmm, Si is a repository of detailed impressions. In some sense Si is the most patient perceiving function simply because they aren't as quick to make intuitive leaps like Ne/Ni and focus on more than what's immediately in front of them like Se. I don't think Si types rely on others' internal perception because theirs is so rich and detailed anyways. If anything, Si types might think that others' internal perception could be lacking to a degree.
ESTJs are likely to succeed at management because they respect structure and contribute to it. Most businesses thrive with an efficient and effective internal structure which ESTJs excel in. ESTJs can adopt the company values and incorporate them into their own. In some sense they become well groomed representatives of said company which is why companies entrust them with power.
How does reading from a teleprompter mean one sucks with Fe? Barack Obama has Fe and was able to wield it to increase his popularity from being a relative unknown in 2008 to becoming an icon for change and he still speaks with a teleprompter. In some ways Trump is following Obama's formula from 2008 but articulating himself much differently. Obama wanted to convey appealing ideological platitudes to the masses. He wanted his (staged)idealism to speak for him whereas Trump isn't so much about idealism but creating an indomitable presence and wants that to speak for him. In a microcosm this could illustrate slight ENTP/ESTP differences in persona. ENTPs want to communicate with charm and ideas/platitudes while ESTPs want to communicate with shock value and their own powerful presence.
Trump might misfire and fall on his face but the difference with him and Hillary is that he gains momentum from that and it confuses and frustrates the shit out of his detractors. When Hillary does it there is no rebound no silver lining, just utter failure and she changes her tune because there is not improv or contingency for the negative feedback. Trump doesn't let the political winds reshape his approach. Maybe some of his words are changed (such is the nature of politics) but his overall approach and presence remains in tact. Trump sort of has a 'mutually assured destruction' pact as well as a mutually beneficial pact with the media when you really think about it. When the media covers Trump it's guaranteed entertainment which means more eyeballs paying attention to their coverage. His presence brings eyeballs over. In exchange Trump gets more free media coverage than even the Clinton machine even if it's negative. Look at this thread even, lol. This started off as Hillary's personality type and it naturally gravitated towards Trump as well. Everyone looking this thread was also thinking 'Yeah, but what about Trump?"
Oh forgot to add, the destruction aspects shows when the media attacks Trump they also expose themselves because in order to attack him properly they need to forgo their phony mask of objectivity and show they are just as manipulative as the man they are attacking.
