If "Fe" and "Te" are structures within which thought and feeling move toward evaluation (and "Ne" and "Se" are styles of attention paid in the collection and experience of data), and they all rely on this harmonization, then I don't know, I just had to repeat it to see if anyone else is as surprised as I am.
An omniscient agent could harmonize with the ideal standard, the world as it is. But regular individuals cannot. They rely instead on perception of the world and construction of standards over time, and that--dynamic construction with other people--becomes the standard. Maybe this is more pronounced in the case of Fe. Maybe not. It's interesting, though--isn't it?--that there has to be the two aspects, one settling on judgment and the other moving judgment forward. Apparently it's this second aspect that keeps on surprising people. They get shafted by the first aspect then the second aspect goes and changes things.
Is it just me, or is that not a pathway toward not denying the legitimacy of "the other" system of judgment and expression? In theory, since both Ji and Je have dynamic aspects, one day they coincide. The process of reaching coincidence will be very, very unpleasant, but the end result is... could be... the same?
Potentially not, though. Ji retains its dynamism by avoiding contact with other judgments; Je retains its dynamism by avoiding too heavy influence of individual judgment.
It's an interesting result. On the one hand, if you all know you're using different terms for your judgments, why insist on other people using your terms? On the other hand, everyone has terms that at some point they must harmonize with others or they'll have those terms fail to function.
:uni: