noimage
New member
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2016
- Messages
- 34
- Enneagram
- 9
Excuse the kind of out-there, clickbait-ish title.
I have just created a thread on vegetotherapy and process/depth psychology (supposedly, post-Jungian) and I do wonder whether there is indeed a strict dichotomy between Jungian and post-Jungian psychology.
Could it be that Jungian typology (as a subset of Jungian psychology), in all of its legitimacy, provides shelter for those with a weak sense of self (which can also be legitimized by postmodernism), possibly stemming from enmeshed boundaries with primary caregivers and more or less covert/subtle abuse?
Is this an old ''debate'' in the community? Is it even worthy of being called a debate? Do you think that these approaches do contradict each other?
I have just created a thread on vegetotherapy and process/depth psychology (supposedly, post-Jungian) and I do wonder whether there is indeed a strict dichotomy between Jungian and post-Jungian psychology.
Could it be that Jungian typology (as a subset of Jungian psychology), in all of its legitimacy, provides shelter for those with a weak sense of self (which can also be legitimized by postmodernism), possibly stemming from enmeshed boundaries with primary caregivers and more or less covert/subtle abuse?
Is this an old ''debate'' in the community? Is it even worthy of being called a debate? Do you think that these approaches do contradict each other?