Kingu Kurimuzon
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2013
- Messages
- 20,940
- MBTI Type
- I
- Enneagram
- 9w8
- Instinctual Variant
- sp/sx
Socionics Personality Types Comparison:
(Key: ISTp = SLI, INTp = ILI)
(Key: ISTp = SLI, INTp = ILI)
1. When assessing an option or available choice, ISTps tend to focus more on how the choice could benefit them (what it would potentially yield) than INTps would. On the other hand, INTps would be more cognizant of the potential risks and potential losses that may accompany the decision that ISTps may unconsciously minimize.
2. INTps are more likely than ISTps to tackle a task in its entirety, rather than breaking it up into smaller separate stages.
3. When ISTps form opinions of others, these opinions are formed under the influence of their attitude towards the group to which the person belongs. To ISTps, it is incomprehensible how it is possible to belong to two opposing groups at the same time:, i.e., "you're either with us, or with them and against us."
4. When doing a task, INTps are inclined to work for the sake of the result (for example, a reward or bonus for completing the task). In contrast to ISTps, INTps can renounce their comforts and conveniences for this; INTps evaluate their place of work by looking at what returns they get for the effort they invested (e.g., monetary, prestige, etc.).
5. When it comes to completing a task, INTps are more likely than ISTps to mobilize for longer periods of time. Specifically, INTps tend to mobilize for an action early and stay mobilized for a longer period of time after the task has been completed. For INTps, this state of readiness is their natural state.
6. INTps are more likely than ISTps to perceive and distinguish themselves primarily through personal qualities. INTps focus on individualism more than ISTps.
7. ISTps, more than INTps, frequently perceives and defines themselves and other people through group associations. ISTps focus on collectivism over individualism.
8. ISTps are rmore relaxed in their natural state than INTps. However ISTps will mobilize and concentrate when needed to accomplish an objective. After the task has been completed, ISTps demobilize again. This state of demobilization is the natural state of ISTps.
9. When describing why they undertook a project, INTps are more likely than ISTps to focus on the moment when a decision is made and to speak in detail about the stages of its implementation.
10. ISTps are often able to form quicker opinions of others they have just met than INTps. This is based on the ability of ISTps to draw conclusions about the person based on the groups the person belongs to; INTps are more reluctant to make these inferences.
11. When solving a problem, INTps rely more heavily on their generalized past experiences than ISTps. INTps are inclined to use already prepared, preformulated methods and processes to solve a problem.
12. When working on a project, ISTps experience more discomfort (than INTps) if the project does not have a clearly delineated end-goal or result. This happens because ISTps have more difficulty monitoring and understanding how the project is developing than INTps because they are outside of the process.
13. When working on a project, ISTps are more likely than INTps to break up larger tasks into several stages. Then ISTps mobilize to carry out each stage (and demobilize between the stages).
14. INTps attitude towards a specific person (more so than ISTps) is based on their personal characteristics (authority, intellect, personal achievements, etc.) INTps recognize superiority of certain individuals drawing from their personal qualities
15. When discussing work, INTps are more likely than ISTps to focus on the fruits of their labor, about what their effort will yield. ISTps on the other hand are more likely to focus on the environment they work in, e.g., their work conditions, conveniences, commute time, etc.
16. When planning to complete something, ISTps are more likely to focus their attention on the goal itself, overlooking and deprioritizing the individual actions needed to reach that goal. On the other hand, INTps tend to focus their attention on the each action; i.e., they're focused on how each decision and choice is being made (towards reaching the goal), in a step by step process.
17. INTps tend to be more idealistic with their heads-in-the-cloud. ISTps, on the other hand, are more realistic and down-to-earth.
18. ISTps tend to judge their available options by how likely the option will help them reach their goal. If a choice no longer helps ISTps reach their goals, it will be dismissed and discontinued. On the other hand, INTps prefer to continue pursuing their current option, opting to adjust their ultimate goal in order to fit the current choice.
19. INTps are often more interested in the idea or theory of something, whereas ISTps are more interested in the actual practice or implementation of it.
20. ISTps are more naturally comfortable with physical confrontations than INTps.
21. When developing a plan of action or process, INTps tend to see themselves as "within the process"; they are immersed in it. Often because of this, they have more difficulty managing several plans at once. On the other hand, ISTps tend to place themselves "outside of the process"; they dissociate from it. For them the process or situation is something external from themselves.
22. ISTps are better at noticing details than INTps. INTps on the other hand, are better at seeing the big picture than ISTps.
23. When describing their reasoning for their actions, ISTps (more so than INTps) tend describe how and why they came to a certain decision, and focus less on the timing and initiation of the action.
24. When getting ready to start a project, ISTps spend more time planning and preparing for the project than INTps. In particular, ISTps spend more time discussing the plan, discussing options and ways to approach the project, etc.)
25. INTps are able to change and make adjustments to their goals more easily than ISTps (depending on how progress is being made, etc.). ISTps on the other hand, prefer to stick with their original goals.
26. INTps are more focused on ideas and concepts than ISTps. On the other hand, ISTps are more focused (than INTps) on their surroundings.
27. When solving a problem, ISTps are more inclined (than INTps) to solve it by relying predominantly on only the presently available information. Essentially, ISTps will develop a process or method uniquely fitted towards the present problem, and this method is designed using the present conditions and information.
28. When conversing, INTps types are inclined to communicate in the form of monologues, where each party has "its turn." Because of that they subconsciously attempt to transform a dialogue into a series of monologues. Conversely, ISTps tend to prefer more of a question and answer style format.
29. INTps pay more particular attention to aspects of a situation or plan that are insufficient or lacking. This can be interpreted by others as INTps having a negative assessment of various situations and events (.e.g, "the glass is half empty). On the other hand, ISTps pay more attention to what is actually present in a situation, and this can be interpreted as an affirmative or positive manifestation of the surrounding world, situations, possibilities, and prospects (e.g. "the glass is half full").
30. When contemplating a task, it takes ISTps longer time to mobilize than INTps; i.e., ISTps prefer to spend some time in a more natural state of relaxedness which will then prepare them to subsequently mobilize and concentrate at the crucial moments, improving their performance.
2. INTps are more likely than ISTps to tackle a task in its entirety, rather than breaking it up into smaller separate stages.
3. When ISTps form opinions of others, these opinions are formed under the influence of their attitude towards the group to which the person belongs. To ISTps, it is incomprehensible how it is possible to belong to two opposing groups at the same time:, i.e., "you're either with us, or with them and against us."
4. When doing a task, INTps are inclined to work for the sake of the result (for example, a reward or bonus for completing the task). In contrast to ISTps, INTps can renounce their comforts and conveniences for this; INTps evaluate their place of work by looking at what returns they get for the effort they invested (e.g., monetary, prestige, etc.).
5. When it comes to completing a task, INTps are more likely than ISTps to mobilize for longer periods of time. Specifically, INTps tend to mobilize for an action early and stay mobilized for a longer period of time after the task has been completed. For INTps, this state of readiness is their natural state.
6. INTps are more likely than ISTps to perceive and distinguish themselves primarily through personal qualities. INTps focus on individualism more than ISTps.
7. ISTps, more than INTps, frequently perceives and defines themselves and other people through group associations. ISTps focus on collectivism over individualism.
8. ISTps are rmore relaxed in their natural state than INTps. However ISTps will mobilize and concentrate when needed to accomplish an objective. After the task has been completed, ISTps demobilize again. This state of demobilization is the natural state of ISTps.
9. When describing why they undertook a project, INTps are more likely than ISTps to focus on the moment when a decision is made and to speak in detail about the stages of its implementation.
10. ISTps are often able to form quicker opinions of others they have just met than INTps. This is based on the ability of ISTps to draw conclusions about the person based on the groups the person belongs to; INTps are more reluctant to make these inferences.
11. When solving a problem, INTps rely more heavily on their generalized past experiences than ISTps. INTps are inclined to use already prepared, preformulated methods and processes to solve a problem.
12. When working on a project, ISTps experience more discomfort (than INTps) if the project does not have a clearly delineated end-goal or result. This happens because ISTps have more difficulty monitoring and understanding how the project is developing than INTps because they are outside of the process.
13. When working on a project, ISTps are more likely than INTps to break up larger tasks into several stages. Then ISTps mobilize to carry out each stage (and demobilize between the stages).
14. INTps attitude towards a specific person (more so than ISTps) is based on their personal characteristics (authority, intellect, personal achievements, etc.) INTps recognize superiority of certain individuals drawing from their personal qualities
15. When discussing work, INTps are more likely than ISTps to focus on the fruits of their labor, about what their effort will yield. ISTps on the other hand are more likely to focus on the environment they work in, e.g., their work conditions, conveniences, commute time, etc.
16. When planning to complete something, ISTps are more likely to focus their attention on the goal itself, overlooking and deprioritizing the individual actions needed to reach that goal. On the other hand, INTps tend to focus their attention on the each action; i.e., they're focused on how each decision and choice is being made (towards reaching the goal), in a step by step process.
17. INTps tend to be more idealistic with their heads-in-the-cloud. ISTps, on the other hand, are more realistic and down-to-earth.
18. ISTps tend to judge their available options by how likely the option will help them reach their goal. If a choice no longer helps ISTps reach their goals, it will be dismissed and discontinued. On the other hand, INTps prefer to continue pursuing their current option, opting to adjust their ultimate goal in order to fit the current choice.
19. INTps are often more interested in the idea or theory of something, whereas ISTps are more interested in the actual practice or implementation of it.
20. ISTps are more naturally comfortable with physical confrontations than INTps.
21. When developing a plan of action or process, INTps tend to see themselves as "within the process"; they are immersed in it. Often because of this, they have more difficulty managing several plans at once. On the other hand, ISTps tend to place themselves "outside of the process"; they dissociate from it. For them the process or situation is something external from themselves.
22. ISTps are better at noticing details than INTps. INTps on the other hand, are better at seeing the big picture than ISTps.
23. When describing their reasoning for their actions, ISTps (more so than INTps) tend describe how and why they came to a certain decision, and focus less on the timing and initiation of the action.
24. When getting ready to start a project, ISTps spend more time planning and preparing for the project than INTps. In particular, ISTps spend more time discussing the plan, discussing options and ways to approach the project, etc.)
25. INTps are able to change and make adjustments to their goals more easily than ISTps (depending on how progress is being made, etc.). ISTps on the other hand, prefer to stick with their original goals.
26. INTps are more focused on ideas and concepts than ISTps. On the other hand, ISTps are more focused (than INTps) on their surroundings.
27. When solving a problem, ISTps are more inclined (than INTps) to solve it by relying predominantly on only the presently available information. Essentially, ISTps will develop a process or method uniquely fitted towards the present problem, and this method is designed using the present conditions and information.
28. When conversing, INTps types are inclined to communicate in the form of monologues, where each party has "its turn." Because of that they subconsciously attempt to transform a dialogue into a series of monologues. Conversely, ISTps tend to prefer more of a question and answer style format.
29. INTps pay more particular attention to aspects of a situation or plan that are insufficient or lacking. This can be interpreted by others as INTps having a negative assessment of various situations and events (.e.g, "the glass is half empty). On the other hand, ISTps pay more attention to what is actually present in a situation, and this can be interpreted as an affirmative or positive manifestation of the surrounding world, situations, possibilities, and prospects (e.g. "the glass is half full").
30. When contemplating a task, it takes ISTps longer time to mobilize than INTps; i.e., ISTps prefer to spend some time in a more natural state of relaxedness which will then prepare them to subsequently mobilize and concentrate at the crucial moments, improving their performance.
