Virtual ghost
Complex paradigm
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2008
- Messages
- 19,908
Well, it is well knows that people at the top are often morally fuzzy. Therefore who is here a sociopath or psychopath is basically irrelevant. However for the most common Ukrainian people it is objectively better that the country isn't overrun. Someone who is unleashing this level of destruction upon civilian infrastructure simply can't have any good intentions towards the population. Especially if we consider how local history looks like. Therefore in my book it is totally ok to support the people of Ukraine, even if someone might get some geopolitical advantages over that. What in the case of Ukraine's survival is most likely to be EU, since it is getting a huge new member state that is full of various resources that are needed globally. Plus some toxic relationships got "defined" over this. However cheap geopolitical moralization really isn't the right tone here since people are dying in mass and one side is much more to blame for that. The fact that there is now stampede of about a dozen countries that are looking a way how to join EU or NATO as quickly as possible only proves this. What proves that someone here made something very morally wrong, what goes way beyond classic global games.