PinkIceTD
New member
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2008
- Messages
- 299
- MBTI Type
- ENFP
there is an F in your personality type, but you can own most T types in strategic and analytical thinking.
yep.
there is an F in your personality type, but you can own most T types in strategic and analytical thinking.
...you can't stay on topic.
+1there is an F in your personality type, but you can own most T types in strategic and analytical thinking.
Are you a male?It's a pity most people who know us realise it though and sort of mistype us as thinkers. Though some you have to encourage not to bet against you for their own sake. I used to beat Dad at chess by reading how he made his moves and playing with his thinking. ie. rather than playing the best logical move, play his strategic blind spot. It was funny because his logical thinking is flawless and he is far higher IQ. It's sort of evil having that extra people element. And winning poker when everyone thinks you are too drunk to concentrate, but you are still subconsciously learning how to play them and shaping their view of how they think you play. I think poker is one we are very at home with, because it is reading people's trends and playing percentages, two things our primary function does naturally.
Are you a male?
Hmm, ever since grade school I have been jokingly, and at times, not so jokingly called and accused of being some kind of lawyer.yep. How does it differ with females? Probably less likely to get the thinker label, yeh?
I ask this because I think male ENFPs are more prone to use our people skills to their advantage, so to speak.
I am very good at reading people, but I cannot think of any scenario where I use this ability against them.
When I play chess I am really concentrated on the board and where the chess pieces are on the board, holistically, any strategy that I use is subconscious, but for a novice, I am pretty decent at it.
When I play Scrabble, however, I can be consciously strategic in my playing but usually prefer making the coolest words possible over making the words that would yield the most points.
I don't know if I have a highly developed Te or a good conversational memory, but when arguing/debating/discussing something with a group of people or a person one on one, I am quite good at staying on course, stating and clarifying my points, and keeping the exchanging of ideas organized.
Hmm, ever since grade school I have been jokingly, and at times, not so jokingly called and accused of being some kind of lawyer.
I am a lover of logic, and have a deep respect and reverence for the Truth, I just happen to be quite passionate in my reception and expression of both.
Hahahaha, I am a professional college student, with 127 units completed, (over 180 units attempted ), and two more semesters left, after this one, before I finally officially complete/receive my BA.. I've got called both rainman and best personality in a friendship circle on facebook. Talk about contradictory. Maybe we romanticise logic even if it is taken to the almost autistic extreme sometimes.
What do you work in out of interest? I'm in physics which sort of makes my thinking side get a lot of focus. Looking for a career change though.
Hahahaha, I am a professional college student, with 127 units completed, (over 180 units attempted ), and two more semesters left, after this one, before I finally officially complete/receive my BA.
Spent my first year as a math major, a couple years undecided (thinking about becoming a dance major), a year as a liberal studies major, and three semesters as a biology major.
I am currently a psychology major and am fascinated by human evolution, ethology and sexuality.
I do odd things to make enough money to get by.
As for a future living, I dunno, I think I definitely want to both write and teach.
What I did realize, however, after being a bio major for almost two years, is that I am not meant to be a scientist, but rather am a science enthusiast.
I am big into understanding dynamic relationships between/within macrosystems, and hence am more interested in scientific theory than in technological application.
Laboratory work for the lose. :zzz:
....Also winning poker...you are still subconsciously learning how to play them and shaping their view of how they think you play. I think poker is one we are very at home with, because it is reading people's trends and playing percentages, two things our primary function does naturally.
HAHAHAHAHAHHAA!!!I think the professional student is type related. I'm in my 9th year at uni. Got Honours in Engineering and Science and almost finished a masters/phd but realised as you did that the technical application drives me nuts and bores me. Didn't attend enough in undergrad to notice
Travelling and writing would be a cool job. It is interesting you mention evolution too. I love understanding development and evolution in almost any context.
Yeh, when I work it is normally for a decent wage and in 3 to 6 month bursts. I realise I need money for something and think of the most efficient way to get there. Somehow I'm honest about that and bosses still don't mind me.
I suck balls at poker, I can never hide my enthusiasm when I have a great hand. :blushing:....
Wow, maybe this is part of why I'm horrible at poker. I am humbled before you guys. Still love the game, though.
I suck balls at poker, I can never hide my enthusiasm when I have a great hand. :blushing:
Pure genius!!!I think that is why I play better when drunk . I just pay attention to anything else but the cards and sort of throw them to background thoughts. Take a glance and get back to conversation and no one can tell if I'm excited about the cards or the conversation . I get a bit too excited sometimes though, and just want to get to the end of the hand to see how it plays out. The strange thing is these are normally going for weird hands, rather than when I have two aces.