Someone said that xNFP's are elegant and xNFJ's aren't. I disagree. I've always thought that xNFP's have more fairy-like tinkerbell kind of elegance and aura to them whereas xNFJ's have a more angelic Galadriel (from Lord of the Rings) kind of aura. Thoughts?
NFPs? Elegant?
What are you going to ask next, if INFPs are smarter than INTJs?
I'm totally lost....how does type play into elegance and what does Lord of the Rings have to do with any of it?
Cynical Sy feels cynical reading this topic.
And that's the last someone calls me fairy cause I'm an ENFP male btw!
And for the record, I think Aragorn is a textbook INFJ.
What do you mean by textbook INFJ?
Make sure you jump to 9:10 in the first video before you start watching, and then watch the second video.
YouTube - Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire Part. 14
YouTube - Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire Part. 15
I love how Harry seems to be so boxed in, so deprived of hope. Then he summons up all his courage in that incredible look of determination he puts on at 9:25, stands up to Voldemort, and makes it out alive. Very courageous. And I know that a lot of people seem to disagree with Harry being an INFP. But, as far as I'm concerned, he's an INFP, and that clip right there is a great INFP moment period.
Interesting. I have a hard time typing Harry from the movies anyway. He is such a weak character that they almost write him like a video game character so that the viewer/player will have an easier time inserting themselves into the role. I think this is the way it is with the Potter movies: you are more supposed to insert yourself into the role, rather than view the movie as an outsider. That is why Harry seems like such a blank slate. I mean, I never have really believed even once that he has been excited, scared, happy, sad, etc. and it's not just because they're all kids/juveniles, and it's not because the story is poorly written. I truly think it is designed this way on purpose.
So, I guess I could see Harry as INFP, if the Fi just isn't very opinionated and doesn't feel strongly...
text·book
adj. Being a characteristic example of its kind; classic: a textbook case of schizophrenia.
You are confusing the character and the book with the terrible acting of Daniel Radcliffe.