so sad. people don't even know what intj means. or any 4letter code. and argue about whether they are it, or whether they ain't it. you should get away from types and argue about single traits instead. are you 'like a boss', for instance, within your interaction on the message board, or do you actually have any sense of the future of the process of the message board, and which sort of sense and so on .... arguing can be constructive and lead to insight, when you are arguing about something that can be partially perceived by both parties of the argument, but arguing with other people about images that only exists in your imagination, through words that are linked to different images in other peoples minds, that implies at least a certain degree of unawareness about the general problem of perception, which implies you are not perception dominant, especially not in a subjective meta-way (introverted), if not a degree of stupidity. people have to 'unlearn' to hallucinate, before they can learn something about the reality of typology. when you see the reality, you will see how the theory, as it goes around, misguides people about reality. this is the number one reason for inconsistent typing. people who allow themselves to be misguided, that is people who want to experience themselves as experts of typology, before they have perceived the underlying reality, they are hallucinating random bouts of insane type theory, which infects all other people, who are vulnerable to the temptation of premature expertise. it's not that people don't want the truth, that they want to be someone else. no one wants that intrinsically, because pretension of identity is the biggest suffering a psyche can go through. every one wants accurate orientation within their own intelligence and worldview. it's just that people want orientation way too much, too urgently, so they settle on premature speculations. the most counter-egoic thing about typology is, that you have to learn something about all other personality types, in order to understand your own self through typology, because typology depends on at least some basic comparisons. few are up to that challenge.