In all honesty, I don't see much of a point in rejecting Christianity just because of its teachings on homosexuality.
Quite honestly, your attempts at undermining the Bible and Christianity are rather weak. And this is further confirmed if your main purpose here is because of its teachings on homosexuality.
Well, which are you saying? That people:
A. Shouldn't reject Christianity as a whole if they choose to disagree with some of it's teachings?
B. That people should accept all of the teachings if they find most of them valid, regardless of their personal feelings?
And yes, I suppose it's homosexuality, other gender issues, and women's rights. Oh, and slavery.
I wish this belief wasn't as common as it is. If only moderate Christians (ESPECIALLY Christians who accept evolution/science/homosexuality and who accept other religions) got more publicity. Non-Christians often don't even know that they exist. (Which is because they're quieter, and not as fiery.)
It's sad. It's like "I've seen horrible Christians on TV. Therefore, they're all bad, because they must ALL be like that. Because the Christians on TV MUST be a scientifically accurate survey of what Christians are like irl."
I always thought I was kind of unique in that perspective. Are you telling me it's common?
I've always heard a lot of Christians say that such people don't count as Christians because they don't accept all of the teachings, and that they'd rather people just admit that they reject Christianity than pretend to be something they're not. So I did thusly. I'm not sure what to make of that...
Now, on to answering the OP: I'm an Episcopalian. (Important side note: I'm left-wing!) Big, BIG difference from American Evangelicalism, for those who know about us. My mother is a combination of Episcopalian and Buddhist. I have friends of every religion. I don't try to convert anyone, because I believe that all religions are just different paths to the same goal. I was raised in a community of atheists, buddhists, pagans, wiccans, etc (mostly atheists), and they looked down on all Christians for that exact reason. I kept my religion to myself. To this day, I find my religion to be deeply personal, to the point that I only truly practice my religion when I'm alone. I only go to church for the music (I <3 Anglican church music), the people and the atmosphere.
That is exactly what I believe, and it's the reason I'm an agnostic. I believe there's a higher being, and a spiritual aspect of the world, but I don't believe there's a single philosophy about it that's true and falsifies all the others. Because there's a lot of overlap, and the things that do overlap seem like the more significant ones. The things that don't seem less important and more like they might have been artifacts of the culture or writer's perspective.
Yeah... I've never heard of anyone going to church for the atmosphere. I've only heard of people going in order to show service to God, since that was supposedly the purpose. I'm kind of surprised anyone would think of it that way.