It seems the TJ's are getting the baddest rap here.
This appears to be because the TJ's are both "directive" and "structure-focused". These are Linda Berens' concepts in her interpretation of Keirseyan tempermemt, and her own Interaction Styles model. "Directing" interaction styles are "In Charge" and "Chart the Course". The Structure-focused temperaments are SJ and NT. Structure is defined as: "The Rational and Guardian patterns are characterized by a focus on
structure, order, and organization to gain a measure of
control over life's problems and irregularities rather than be at the mercy of random forces". FP's are the opposite, both "informing" and "motive-oriented". Motive-oriented is described as
working with people, rather than forcing them into structures. "Directing" communication will be tend to come off as more serious and critical, while "informing" will be less so. So Directing + Structure types (TJ, with preferred Te) will tend to be more critical, and less liked by people, while FP's (preferred Fi) will appear to be more friendly.
FJ's (preferred Fe) and TP's (preferred Ti) will both be inbetween, combining either Structure with Informing, or Motive with Directing. That is what we see here, with TJ's.
You can see all of this at Roger Bissel's essay on the Judging types, at:
Achilles Tendencies: Exploring Human Frailty and Personality Type
Of course, no type is really more evil than another. They all have their strengths and weaknesses. If you need somethign accomplished, efficiently, the TJ's will tend to be the best to get the job done. It's just on a person-to person level that their total task-focus may make them appear negative. Likewise, other types will have their negative ractions as well; they are just slower in building up to that level. Some will be passive-aggressive. Others will be so fun-oriented, they will not be good at responsibilities. So t all pretty much evens out. Which type you get along with better will depend on your own temperament needs (people vs task, etc).