ok...
1)why is it that your existence (or lack thereof) before you were conscious was/is/will be different than your existence (or lack thereof) after you cease to be conscious (ie, dead)?
2)how can time, the common perception of it, be anything but logically fallacious? that is, given immortality, does time simply cease?
3)if you could live forever, wouldn't it be prudent of you to choose not to? either this is the only plane of existence, or else immortality is extremely irrational. is immortality, then, futile? is the ceasure of this life not becoming?
4) re-asking one of the best questions i've come across on this site, "is death completion or waste?"
i agree with some of your thoughts, and others i don't. (typical..)
i agree that it is just to seek to become god.
i like your thoughts on the distinction between hope and faith. hope is blind, faith is seeing.
i agree, logic is limiting. i've said it dozens of times, now.
yes, perception is omnidimensional, or at least, i think so.
i don't think that the evolution of humanity has had alien forces as a causative factor. i don't buy the uniqueness/exceptional-ness of humans, or of other animals (dogs, cats, pigs...whatever else you mentioned), as being reason enough to assume an external force. i believe it is happenstance, a product of chaos. given our limited scope of seeing, and the sheer expanse of that scope (in that, given that the known-known is as vast as it is, the unknown-unknown must be exponentially more vast...)...is it not obvious that it was bound to happen somewhere, somehow? why not here, and in this way? perhaps then, the exceptional-ness of human life is more an indication of its production from random and vast chaos, rather than an indication of not? hmm?
more importantly, though..you mention that it is appropriate to record your thoughts in the hopes that future generations may be able to better understand them if you find that they are ahead of your own time, or quote someone...indicating you find value in that notion yourself. i find utility in that too, yes. however, i put it to you, is it not out of duty that you must also not forsake the current times?
there exists a past, a present, and a future (assuming your death)...you seem to emphasize the future in your writings. but the present, and the past...are they not worthwhile?
i'm especially interested in hearing whether or not you would choose to die, if the choice was yours.